期刊文献+

普罗帕酮治疗阵发性室上性心动过速的疗效观察 被引量:5

Clinical Observation of Propafenone in Treating Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:总结评价普罗帕酮治疗阵发性室上性心动过速的疗效及安全性。方法:40例阵发性室上性心动过速患者,在心电监护下,给予普罗帕酮70mg静脉注射,10min内注射完成;首剂未能转律者,再每10min静脉注射普罗帕酮35mg,最大累积用量不超过175mg。复律后给予口服普罗帕酮150-200mg,每日3次维持治疗。观察开始给药后的转复率及不良反应的发生情况。结果:31例(31/40,77.5%)首剂即转窦性心律,6例追加剂量后转为窦性心律,总有效率92.5%(37/40)。继续予口服普罗帕酮治疗半年以上,未见严重不良反应,未见复发者。结论:普罗帕酮治疗阵发性室上性心动过速,疗效显著且不良反应轻微。 Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic and side effect of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). Methods:40 patients with PSVT were recruited. Under electrocardiogram and BP monitoring, propafenone was prescribed at first dose of 70rag by intravenous injection during 10 minutes. If the heart sinus rhythm couldn't be recovery after the first dose, 35 mg of propafenone could be duplicated after a 10 minutes interval and the maximum cumulative dosage was 175rag. After the heart sinus rhythm was recovery, oral propafenone was prescribed 150-200rng three times a day. All the patients were followed for response rate and relative side effect. Results: 31 cases (31/40, 77. 5%) were recovery to sinus rhythm after the first dose and 6 cases recovery after boost. The total response rate was 92. 5% (37/40). Maintaining therapy for at least half year, there was no recurrence or serious side effect. Conclusion: Propafenone is effective and safe in treating PSVT.
出处 《医学理论与实践》 2009年第1期6-7,共2页 The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
关键词 普罗帕酮 阵发性室上性心动过速 疗效 Propafenone, Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

  • 1曹珍菊,康凯.静脉注射维拉帕米或普罗帕酮治疗阵发性室上性心动过速的对比观察[J].心肺血管病杂志,1997,16(1):45-46. 被引量:3
  • 2Hohnloser SH, Kuck HH, Lihenthal J, et al. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation: Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomized trial. Lancet, 2000,356:1789-1794.
  • 3The AFFIRM Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347:1825-1833.
  • 4Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med, 2002,247:1834-1840.
  • 5Carlsson J, Miketic S, Windeler J, et al. Randomized trial of ratecontrol versus rhythm-control in persistent atrial fibrillation: the Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003,41 : 1690-1696.
  • 6Weerasooriya R, Davis M, Powell A, et al. The Australian Intervention Randomized Control of Rate in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (AIRCRAFT). J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003,41:1697-1701.
  • 7Pappone C, Augello G, Vicedomini G, et al. Ablation versus medical therapy for atrial fibrillation: who benefit the most? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2003,26(4 pt Ⅱ ):986.
  • 8The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Investigators.Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality and a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med, 1989,321:406-412.
  • 9Zipes DP, Wellens HJJ. What have we learned about cardiac arrhythmias? Circulation, 2000,102(20 Suppl 4) :Ⅳ52-57.
  • 10Sager PT. New advances in class Ⅲ antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Curr Opin Cardiol, 2000,15:41-53.

共引文献192

同被引文献28

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部