期刊文献+

搅拌反应器中计算流体力学数值模拟的影响因素研究进展 被引量:22

Several factors of CFD numerical simulation in stirred tank
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 回顾了搅拌反应器中计算流体力学(CFD)数值模拟方法的研究历程,包括搅拌桨叶边界条件法、内外迭代法、滑移网格法、多重参考系法、快速照相法等方法;结合各种模拟方法的特点,对机械搅拌反应器数值模拟过程中的挡板的存在、尾涡的消除、复杂桨叶类型的模拟、网格精度的影响、湍流模型的选择、离散格式的差异等几个因素的影响作了分析。提出了搅拌反应器的CFD数值模拟仍有待深入研究。 The progress of the research on CFD numerical simulation approaches for stirred tank reactors is reviewed, including the imposed impeller boundary condition method, the inner-outer approach, sliding mesh model, multiple frames of reference (MFR) and the snap shot approach method. According to the characteristics of the modeling methods, several main points, i.e., the presence of baffles, the capture of trailing vortex, the modeling of more complex impeller shapes, the choice of turbulence models, the effect of grid resolution and the difference of discretization schemes, are analyzed. Numerical simulation of stirred tank by using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach is still under further study.
出处 《化工进展》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期7-12,共6页 Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress
关键词 搅拌反应器 计算流体力学 数值模拟 stirred tank computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Bartels C, Breuer M, Wechsler K, et al. Computational fluid dynamics applications on parallel-vector computers: computations of stirred vessel flows[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2002, 31(1): 69-97.
  • 2Fletcher D E An improved mathematical model of melt/water detonations----I. Model formulation and example results[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1991, 34(10): 2435-2448.
  • 3Daskopoulos P, Hams C K. Three-dimensional CFD simulations of turbulent flow in baffled stirred tanks: An assessment of the current position[C]. Bradford, UK: Inst of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, Engl, 1996.
  • 4Brucato A, Ciofalo M, Grisafi F, et al. Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: a comparison of alternative modelling approaches[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(21): 3653-3684.
  • 5周国忠,施力田,王英琛.搅拌反应器内计算流体力学模拟技术进展[J].化学工程,2004,32(3):28-32. 被引量:42
  • 6Pericleous KA, Patel M K. Source-sink approach in the modelling of stirredreactors[J]. Physico ChemicaIHydrodynamics, 1987, 9(1-2): 279-297.
  • 7Middleton J C, Pierce F, Lynch P M. Computations of flow fields and complex reaction yield in turbulent stirred reactors, and comparison with experimental data [J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 1986, 64(1): 18-22.
  • 8Brucato A, Brucato V, Rizzuti L, et al. Particle dissolution kinetics inside batch stirred vessels[J]. Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series, 1990, 121: 327-341.
  • 9樊建华,饶麒,王运东,费维扬.涡轮桨搅拌槽内流场的数字PIV测量[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2003,43(12):1605-1608. 被引量:18
  • 10Yu Z, Rasmuson C. Projected area of measurement volume in phase-Doppler anemometry and application for velocity bias correction and particle concentration estimation[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 1999, 27(2): 189-198.

二级参考文献32

  • 1汪焰台.混合澄清器的研究和展望[J].湿法冶金,1994,13(3):6-13. 被引量:8
  • 2Wu Z L. Numerical study of dispersed two-phase flows[D].Norway: Lund Institute of Technology, 2000.
  • 3Jaworski Z, Bujalski W, Otomo N, et al. CFD study of homogenization with dual RUSHTON turbines- comparison with experimental results[J].Trans IChemE, 2000, 78(A):327-333.
  • 4Brucato A, Ciofalo M, Grisafi F, et al. Complete numerical simulation of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: The inner-outer approach[A].8th Euro Conf On Mixing[C].Cambridge, 1994. 155-162.
  • 5Brucato A, Ciofalo M, Grisafi F, et al. Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: a comparison of alternative modeling approaches[J].Chem Eng Sci, 1998, 53: 3653-3684.
  • 6Micale G, Brucato A, Grisafi F, et al. Prediction of flow fields in a dual-impeller stirred vessel[J].AIChE J, 1999, 45: 445-464.
  • 7Luo J V, Issa R I, Gosman A D. Prediction of impeller induced flows in mixing vessels using multiple frames of reference[A].IChemE Symp Ser 136[C].1994. 549-556.
  • 8Naude I, Xuereb C, Bertrand J. Direct prediction of the flows induced by a propeller in an agitated vessel using an unstructured mesh[J].Can J Chem Eng, 1998, 76: 631-640.
  • 9Lane G L, Schwarz M P, Evans G M. Comparison of CFD methods for modeling of stirred tanks [A].10th European Conference on Mixing[C].Delft: 2000. 273-280.
  • 10Oshinowo L, Jaworski Z, Dyster K N, et al. Predicting the tangential velocity field in stirred tanks using the multiple reference frame(MRF) model with validation by LDA measurements[A].10th European Conference on Mixing[C]. Delft: 2000. 281-288.

共引文献76

同被引文献125

引证文献22

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部