期刊文献+

影响上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石预后的因素 被引量:26

Factors affecting the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨影响上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)预后的因素。方法回顾性分析ESWL治疗上尿路结石患者366例的临床资料。治疗结果在随访3月时评估,结石完全排出视为治疗成功,未排或有残石为治疗失败。分析患者及结石特征如性别、年龄(年龄段)、身高、体重、体重指数、病程、疼痛、血尿、结石位置、结石侧别、结石长度、结石宽度等因素与治疗成功率的关系。结果366例碎石成功率63.4%(232/366)。应用χ2检验及t检验比较两组术前资料,发现病程、结石长度及结石宽度是有意义因素,Logistic多因素回归分析排除了结石宽度和病程,说明结石长度是影响体外冲击波碎石的独立因素。结论结石大小是影响上尿路结石ESWL预后的最主要因素。 Objective To investigate the factors affecting the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for upper urinary tract stones. Methods Between January 2003 and January 2006, 366 patients with upper urinary tract stgne underwent ESWL, and the results were identified by regular KUB/IVU or ultrasonography and evaluated 3 months after the treatment. The treatment success was defined as complete clearance of the stones without residual fragments. The stone-free rate was analyzed in relation to the stone features and the patients' clinical characteristics, and the factors identified to significant affect the results were further analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. Results Three months after the treatment, the overall stone-free (success) rate was 63.4% (232/366) in these patients. Chi square test and t test identified the disease course, stone length and width as the factors with significant impact on the stone-free rate. Multivariate analysis excluded the disease course and stone width from the logistic regression model, and identified the stone length as the independent factor affecting the outcome of ESWL. Conclusion The stone length is an independent factor influencing the efficacy of ESWL for upper urinary tract stones.
出处 《南方医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第11期2063-2065,共3页 Journal of Southern Medical University
关键词 体外冲击波碎石术 尿路结石 回归分析 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy urinary calculi regression analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Lalak NJ, Moussa SA, Smith G, et al. The domier compact delta lithotripter: the first 150 ureteral calculi [J]. J Endourol, 2002, 16 (9): 645-8.
  • 2Obek C, Onal B, Kantay K, et al. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi [J]. J Urol, 2001, 166(6): 2081-5.
  • 3Sorensen CM, Chandhoke PS. Is lower pole calieeal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones [J ] ? J Urol, 2002, 168(6): 2377-83.
  • 4Gnanapragasam VJ, Ramsden PD, Murthy LS, et al. Primary in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management ofureteric calculi: results with a third-generation lithotripter [J]. BJU Int, 1999, 84(7): 770-4.
  • 5Bierkens AF, Hendrikx AJ, De La Rosette J J, et al. Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness[J]. Br J Urol, 1998, 81(1): 31-5.
  • 6Abdel-Khalek M, Sheir K, Elsobky E, et al. Prognostic factors for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones--a multivariate analysis study[J]. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2003, 37(5): 413-8.
  • 7Sumino Y, Mimata H, Tasaki Y, et al. Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy [J]. J Urol, 2002, 168(4 Pt 1): 1344-7.
  • 8Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL, et al. Lower-pole caliceal stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, pereutaneous nephrolithotomy, and flexible ureteroscopy: impact of radiographic spatial anatomy[J]. J Endourol, 1998, 12(2): 113-9.
  • 9Delakas D, Karyotis I, Daskalopoulos G, et al. Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter[J]. J Endourol, 2003, 17(4): 201-5.
  • 10李新德,陈岳兵,许力为,吴海洋,余大敏,芮雪芳,张大宏,李恭会,丁国庆,马亮.影响体外冲击波碎石术疗效的因素分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(5):321-323. 被引量:52

二级参考文献5

  • 1梁丽莉,郭应禄,汤慧娣,石声华.ESWL 治疗输尿管结石失败原因分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(5):273-274. 被引量:200
  • 2Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, et al. Impact of power index,hydroureteronephrosis,stone size and composition on the efficacy of in situ boosted ESWL for primary proximal ureteral calculi. Urology,2001,58:16-22.
  • 3Jonathan M, Flalkov SPH, Bernard F,et al. Reassessing the efficacy of the Dornier MFL-5000 lithotriptor. J Urol,2000 ,164 :640-643.
  • 4Eterovic D, Juretic KL, Capkun V, et al. Pyelolithotomy improves while extracorporeal lithotripsy impairs kidney function. J Urol, 1999,161:39-44.
  • 5Grenabo L,Lindqvist K, Adami HO, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones. Treatment policy is as important for success as type of lithotriptor and patient selection. Arch Surg, 1997,132:20-26.

共引文献51

同被引文献220

引证文献26

二级引证文献140

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部