摘要
目的:比较氢氧化钙(CH)及其制剂用于根管封药消毒的疗效。方法:在临床上选择185例患者,随机分为CH组、CH+碘仿组、CH+甲硝唑组和传统药物甲醛甲酚(FC)对照组,观察记录4组药物根管封药7d内的急性反应(EIP)发生率、疼痛程度和有效率,并进行统计学分析。结果:CH组、CH+碘仿组、CH+甲硝唑组在EIP发生率、疼痛程度和有效率方面皆优于FC组,有显著性差异(P<0.05),而CH组、CH+碘仿组、CH+甲硝唑组之间则无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:CH及其制剂用于根管消毒的效果都优于FC,且封药后的舒适度较高。
OBJECTIVE： To compare the clinical efficacy among different ingredient preparations of calcium hydroxide used for root canal disinfection. METHODS： A total of 185 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to calcium hydroxide group （CH）, calcium hydroxide plus iodoform compound paste group, calcium hydroxide plus metronidazole compound paste group and formaldehyde cresol formocresol group （FC） . The endodontic interappointment pain （EIP） incidence, pain degree and clinical effects within 7 days after medication were observed and compared. Then the results were analyzed using statistics software. RESULTS： There were no significant differences among CH group, CH plus iodoform compound paste group,CH plus metronidazole compound paste group in the EIP incidence, pain degree and curative effect（P 〉 0.05）, but the above 3 groups were superior to FC group in the EIP incidence,pain degree and curative effect （P 〈 0.05）. CONCLUSION： Compared with FC, the clinical effects of the pastes containing CH are superior and which enjoy high comfort degree after root canal medication thus deserve to be popularized in the clinic.
出处
《中国药房》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2008年第35期2775-2777,共3页
China Pharmacy
关键词
根管治疗
氢氧化钙
碘仿
甲硝唑
Root canal therapy
Calcium hydroxide
Iodofor
Metronidazole
