期刊文献+

Overcoming Contradictions Between Growth and Sustainability:Institutional Innovation in the BRICS 被引量:1

Overcoming Contradictions Between Growth and Sustainability:Institutional Innovation in the BRICS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 The recent accelerated growth rates or efforts to emulate countries that have achieved a rapid pace of economic growth are widely acclaimed as means to uplift millions from poverty. In so doing, however, this rapid economic growth is most likely to coincide with unsustainable levels of consumption, place excessive pressure on life support systems and terrestrial sinks and foreshorten options for the future. Rather than pursuing the "Environmental Kuznets Curve"(EKC) hypothesis that higher income will bring with it the means to reduce the impacts of greater consumption, ecological economists assert that buying our way out of future scarcity with fast growth is indeed contradictory with sustainabil- ity. To better understand these contradictions and explore potential institutional innovations that may enable developing nations to better confront them (in effect,"tunneling under"the EKC), this article refers to recent experience in the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa). Beginning with a brief comparative summary of major development and environmental indicators, pressures on resources and society in each of the BRICS are discussed, followed by identification of institutional and policy frameworks each country has evolved to confront the challenges of growth and sustainability. The article closes with general conclusions for further research and information sharing among developing nations. The recent accelerated growth rates or efforts to emulate countries that have achieved a rapid pace of economic growth are widely acclaimed as means to uplift millions from poverty. In so doing, however, this rapid economic growth is most likely to coincide with unsustainable levels of consumption, place excessive pressure on life support systems and terrestrial sinks and foreshorten options for the future. Rather than pursuing the "Environmental Kuznets Curve" (EKC) hypothesis that higher income will bring with it the means to reduce the impacts of greater consumption, ecological economists assert that buying our way out of future scarcity with fast growth is indeed contradictory with sustainability. To better understand these contradictions and explore potential institutional innovations that may enable developing nations to better confront them (in effect, "tunneling under" the EKC), this article refers to recent experience in the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa). Beginning with a brief comparative summary of major development and environmental indicators, pressures on resources and society in each of the BRICS are discussed, followed by identification of institutional and policy frameworks each country has evolved to confront the challenges of growth and sustainability. The article closes with general conclusions for further research and information sharing among developing nations.
作者 Peter H. May
出处 《Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment》 北大核心 2008年第3期3-13,共11页 中国人口·资源与环境(英文版)
关键词 GROWTH SUSTAINABILITY BRICS institutions INNOVATION development policy 制度创新 经济发展 环境库兹涅茨曲线 环境管理
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1.Accelerated and Shared Growth and Initiative of South Africa[]..2006
  • 2.Restoring natural capital: science, business and practice[]..2007
  • 3Bramall C.The Industrialization of Rural China[]..2007
  • 4.Changes in blueprints reflect new development strategy in China[].Peoples Daily Online.2006
  • 5Chomitz K.At Loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and environment in the tropical forests[]..2007
  • 6CIA.The World Factbook[]..2006
  • 7Clewell A F,Aronson J.Motivations for the restoration of ecosystems[].Conservation Biology.2006
  • 8Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF).National Water Resource Strategy[]..2004
  • 9Government of India.Census of India[]..2001
  • 10Government of India.Economic Survey 2006-2007[].-.20062007

同被引文献10

  • 1Archibugi D,Michie J.Technical change,growth and trade:new departures in institutional economics[].Journal of Econometrics.1998
  • 2Archibugi D,Pietrobelli C.The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries-windows of op-portunity or further burden?[].Technological Forecasting.2003
  • 3.
  • 4Lee W L,Chen H.Benchmarking Hong Kong and China energy codes for residential buildings[].Energy and Build.2008
  • 5Munasinghe M.Growth-oriented economic policies and their environmental impacts[].Handbook of Environmental Economics.1999
  • 6Nelson R R.The changing institutional requirements for tech-nological and institutional catch up[].International Journal of Tech-nological LearningInnovationand Development.2007
  • 7Wakelin K.Cheltenham:Trade and Innovation[]..1997
  • 8Walz R.The role of regulation for sustainable infrastructure in-novations:the case of wind energy[].International Journal of Public Policy.2007
  • 9Walz R,Ostertag K,Eichhammer W,et al.Research and Tech-nology Competence for a Sustainable Development in the BRICS Countries[]..2008
  • 10Porter ME,Van der Linde C.Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[].Journal of Econometrics.1995

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部