期刊文献+

中面部牵引成骨术后眶周结构三维位置变化的评估 被引量:1

3-dimensional position changes of periorbital structures after midface distraction osteogenesis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察中面部牵引成骨技术对眼眶周围软、硬组织结构的三维空间位置变化的影响。方法回顾性分析2003年9月至2006年6月接受LeFortⅢ型截骨+中面部牵引成骨术的8例Crouzon综合征患者CT数据,平均年龄11.9岁,实施影像三维重建后,采用眶耳平面(术前)作为测量的基准平面,分别选择眶上点、眶下点、眶内缘点、眶外缘点、眼球前点、眼球后点,以及上、下、内、外四直肌与眼球的附着点作为评估标志,以双侧耳门上点连线作为颅底宽度基准,记录各个主要标志点至耳门上点连线的矢状距(Y轴向)、垂直距(Z轴向)以及眼球前点、眼球后点的水平间距(Z轴向)变化,行配对t检验,并与健康对照组比较。结果牵引成骨术前后眼球前点的Y轴向及Z轴向位置并没有显著性变化,但X轴向间距变化为一3.40mm;眶下点移动在Y轴向平均12.24mm,Z轴向平均4.25mm;眶内缘点移动在Y轴向平均10.11mm,Z轴向平均2.80mm;眶外缘点移动在Y轴向平均9.86mm,Z轴向平均2.31mm;下直肌支点移动,Y轴向平均3.63mm,z轴向平均2.98mm。其余各标记点未见有临床意义的位移变化。结论以Le Fort Ⅲ型截骨为主的面中部牵引成骨技术,可以使Crouzon综合征患者的术后眼眶内、外、下侧壁均出现明显的前、下方移位,而患者的眼球没有显著性的矢状向位置变化,仅呈现轻度的内移、下降和前上方旋转。 Objective To evaluate the 3-D position changes of periorbital structures after midface distraction osteogenesis in patients with Crouzon syndrome. Methods The CT data of 8 cases who had accepted the midface distraction osteogenesis following Le Fort Ⅲ osteotomy were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were averagely 11.9 years old, and the CT was performed before and one year after operation. After 3-D image reconstruction, a right-hand coordinate system based on the preoperational Frankfurt Plane was then established. The pre- and post-operative positions of the superior orbit point ( SOr), inferior orbit point ( IOr), median orbit point (MOr), lateral orbit point (LOr), anterior ocularis point (AO), ocularis eyeball point (PO) and the four insertio ocularis rectus were documented and compared. The positions of these marked points in normal controls were also documented and compared with those in patients. Results After midface distraction osteogenesis, the position of AO was not changed significantly on the y-axis and z-axis, but the distance between two AO points on x-axis was reduced by 3.40 ram; IOr moved averagely 12.24 mm on y-axis and 4.25 mm on z-axis, MOr moved averagely 10.11 mm on y-axis and 2.80 mm on z-axis, LOr moved averagely 9.86 mm on y-axis and 2.31 mm on z-axis. The Inferior Rectus attachment moved averagely 3.63 mm on y-axis and 2.98 mm on z-axis. No other significant change was observed on other marked points. Le Fort III osteotomy can significantly move the medial, Conclusions Midface distraction osteogenesis following lateral and inferior peri-orbital bone structure anteriorly and inferiorly. The eyeballs have no markedly sagital position changes after distraction except slight medial, downwards movements and anterior-upwards rotations.
出处 《中华整形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第6期421-425,共5页 Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
基金 上海市教委基金资助项目(05BZ22)
关键词 骨生成 牵张 三维测量 眼眶 CROUZON综合征 Osteogenesis, distraction 3-dimensional measurement Orbit Crouzon syndrome
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1穆雄铮,俞哲元,韦敏,徐海凇,柴刚,曹德君,张如鸿,冯胜之,张涤生.应用牵引成骨技术治疗中面部骨发育不良畸形[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(15):1055-1057. 被引量:4
  • 2滕利,Andrew A Heggie,Anthony D Holmes.面中部牵引成骨术矫正综合征性面中部后缩畸形[J].中华整形外科杂志,2005,21(1):18-21. 被引量:8
  • 3穆雄铮,冯胜之,张涤生.LeFortⅢ型截骨术对面部外形的影响[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,1992,6(3):156-159. 被引量:4
  • 4Meazzini MC, Mazzoleni F, Caronni E, et al. Le Fort Ⅲ1 advancement osteotomy in the growing child affected by Crouzon' s and Apert' s syndromes: presurgical and postsurgical growth. J Craniofac Surg, 2005,16(3) :369-377.
  • 5Fearon JA. Halo distraction of the Le Fort Ⅲ in syndromic craniosynostosis: a long-term assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2005, 115(6) : 1524-1536.
  • 6Gosain K, Santoro D, Havlik J, et al. Midface distraction following Le Fort Ⅲ and monobloc osteotomies: problems and solutions. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2002,109(6) : 1797-1808.
  • 7Ueki K, Marukawa K, Nakagawa K, et al. Muhidirectional distraction osteogenesis for Crouzon syndrome: technical note. Int J Oral Max Surg, 2005,34(1) : 82-84.
  • 8Shetye P, Boutros S, Grayson B, et al. Midterm follow-up of midface distraction for syndromic craniosynostosis: a clinical and cephalometric study. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007, 120 ( 6 ) : 1621- 1632.
  • 9Kobus KF. New osteotomies for midface advancement in patients with Crouzon syndrome. J Craniofac Surg,2006,17(5):957-961.
  • 10顾晓明,杜长生,徐蓬,张琪,赵弘,王立军,杨成,李钟铭.用牵引成骨矫正Crouzon综合征性严重突眼畸形[J].武警医学,2005,16(5):346-349. 被引量:2

二级参考文献27

  • 1柳春明,黄旭明,侯敏,梁立民,马骁,张海钟,高全文,宋儒耀.经缝牵引成骨早期矫正儿童面中份发育不全[J].中华整形外科杂志,2005,21(2):90-93. 被引量:26
  • 2Chin M, Toth BA. Le Fort Ⅲ advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1997,100: 819-830.
  • 3Gosain AK, Santoro TD, Havlik RJ, et al. Midface distraction following Le Fort Ⅲ and monobloc osteotomies: problems and solutions.Plast Reconstr Surg, 2002,109:1797-1808.
  • 4McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, et al. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1992,89: 1-8.
  • 5Remmler D. McCoy FJ, O' Nei, et al. Osseous expansion of the cranial vault by craniotasis. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1992,89: 787-790.
  • 6Cohen SR, Boydston W, Hudgins R, et al. Monobloc and facial bipartition distraction with internal device. J Craniofac Surg, 1999,10:244-251.
  • 7Cohen SR, Rutrick R, Burstein FD. Distraction osteogenesis in the human craniofacial skeleton: a preliminary report. J Craniofac Surg,1995,6: 368-374.
  • 8Cohen SR, Boydston W, Burstein FD, et al. Monobloc distraction osteogenesis during infancy: report of a case and presention of a new device. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1998,101: 1919-1924.
  • 9Aronson J. Experimental and clinical experience with distraction osteogenesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 1994,31:473-481.
  • 10Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Rigid external distraction: its application in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1998, 102: 1360-1372.

共引文献13

同被引文献21

  • 1穆雄铮,俞哲元,韦敏,徐海凇,柴刚,曹德君,张如鸿,冯胜之,张涤生.应用牵引成骨技术治疗中面部骨发育不良畸形[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(15):1055-1057. 被引量:4
  • 2FearonJA. Halo distraction of the Le Fort III in syndromic craniosynostosis: a long-term assessment.Plast Reconstr Surg,2005,115(6):1524-1536.
  • 3Molina F,Ortiz Monasterio F,de la Paz Aguilar M,et al: Maxillary distraction Aesthetic and functional benefits in cleft lip and palate and prognathic patients during mixed dentition.Hast Reconstr Surg 1999,101:951.
  • 4Guerrero CA,Bell WH,Contasti GI,et al.Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997,35: 383.
  • 5Cope JB, Samchukov ML. Chapter 25, Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: basic principles and clinical applications. Orthodontics: current techniques, 4th edition,2005,Elsevier principles and Mosby.
  • 6Toth BA,Kim JW,Chin M,et al.Distraction osteogenesis and its application to the midface and bony orbit in craniosynostosis syndromes.J Craniofac Surg1998, 9: 100.
  • 7Diner PA,Kollar EM,Martinez H,et al.Intraoral distraction for mandibular lengthening: A technical innovation.J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1996, 24: 92.
  • 8Polley JW Figueroa AA,Charbel FT,et al. Monobloc craniomaxillofacial distraction osteogenesis in a newborn with severe craniofacial synostosis: a preliminary report.J Craniofac Surg 1995,6: 421-423.
  • 9Polley JW,Figueroa AA.Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external,adjustable,rigid distraction device.J Craniofac Surg 1997,8: 181.
  • 10Grubb J,Smith T.Practical application of distraction osteogenesis.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2004,126: 271-2.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部