期刊文献+

不流动资产折价的实证检验——基于我国股权分置改革实践

Empirical Study on Illiquidity Asset Discount:Based on Reform of Equity Segmentation in China
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在连续时间局部均衡模型框架下,求出了时变的不流动资产折价率的解析式;在此基础上,对我国股权分置改革实践中国有股的对价支付进行了实证检验。结果表明:不流动资产折价率的理论研究结果并不支持股改公司实际支付的对价水平。其主要原因在于,各股改公司在确定支付对价比例时,实际上并没有充分考虑公司本身的特征对对价的影响,这说明我国股改过程中对价支付值不尽合理。 Under the framework of continuous-time partial equilibrium,this paper provides a closed-form solution of time-varied illiquidity asset discount ratio. With the research results,it have a empirical examination about the consideration ratio in equity segmentation reform in China. The result shows that there are many differences between theoretical result and practical consideration ratio. The major causes are that,in fact, listed companies in equity segmentation reform don't fully consider the influence of companies' characteristics on consideration when determinating consideration ratio,which also indicates that eonsideration ratio in equity segmentation reform is not rational.
作者 冯玲 郑振龙
出处 《技术经济》 2008年第11期73-80,共8页 Journal of Technology Economics
基金 国家教育部人文社科研究2005年度规划基金项目(05JA790016) 福建省科技厅2006年软科学重点项目(2006R0023) 福建省高等学校新世纪优秀人才支持计划(闽教科文[2007]20号)
关键词 不流动资产折价率 对价水平 股权分置改革 illiquidity discount ratio consideration ratio level equity segmentation reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1LONGSTAFF F A. Optimal portfolio choice and the valuation of illiquid securities[J]. Review of Finance Studies, 2001,14(2) :407-431.
  • 2AMIHUD Y, MENDELSON H. Liquidity, maturity, and the yields on U.S. treasury securities[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1991,46:1411-1425.
  • 3LONGSTAFF F A. Financial claustrophobia: asset pricing in illiquid markets[Z]. NBER Working Paper No. 10411,2004.
  • 4SILBER W L. Discounts on restricted stock:the impact of illiquidity on stock prices[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 1991(7/8) :60-64.
  • 5MICHAILETZ V B, ARTEMENKOV A I,ARTEMENNOV I L. Income approach and discount rates for valuing income-producing illiquid assets' outlines of a new framework[J]. Icfai Journal of Applied Finance, 2007,13( 12): 43-80.
  • 6SUBRAMANIAN A, JARROW R A. The liquidity discount[J]. Mathematical Finance,2001,11:447-474.
  • 7LO A W, MAMAYSKY H, WANG J. Asset prices and trading volume under fixed transactions costs[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2004,112(5):1054-1090.
  • 8DAMODARAN A. Marketability and value: measuring the illiquidity discount [ Z]. Stern School of Business Working Paper,2005,
  • 9KEMPF A, UHRING-HOMBURG M. Liquid and its impact on bond prices [J]. Chmalenbach business review, 2000,52 : 26-44.
  • 10CHEN Zhiwu,XIONG Peng. Discount on illiquid stocks: evidence from China[Z]. Yale ICF Working Paper No. 00-56, 2001.

二级参考文献65

  • 1罗登跃,王春峰,房振明,韩冬.基于时间序列的上海股市系统风险、流动性风险溢价实证研究[J].系统工程,2005,23(7):48-54. 被引量:20
  • 2陆静,李东进.基于流动性风险的证券定价模型及其实证研究[J].中国软科学,2005(12):145-150. 被引量:7
  • 3孔东民.流动性风险与资产定价:来自中国股市的证据[J].南方经济,2006,35(3):91-107. 被引量:18
  • 4Amihud, Yakov, and Haim Mendelson,1989, "The Effects of Beta, Bid-ask Spread, Residual Risk, and Size on Stock Returns", Journal of Finance 44, 479-486.
  • 5Beatty, Randolph P, and Jay R. Ritter, 1986, "Investment Banking, Reputation, and the Underpfieing of Initial Public Offerings", Journalof Financial Economics 15, 213-232.
  • 6Carter, Richard, and Steven Manaster, 1990, " Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter Reputation", Journal of Finance 45, 1045-1067.
  • 7Chamberlin, Edward H. 1962, The Theory of Monopolistic Compotition : A Re-orientation of the Theory of Value, 8th ed. Cambridge, Mass :Harvard University Press.
  • 8Chen Hsuan-Chi, and Jay R. Ritter, 2000, "The Seven Percent Solution", Journal of Finance 55, 1105- 1131.
  • 9Christie, William G, and Paul H. Schuhz, 1994a, "Why do NASDAQ Market Makers Avoid Odd-Eighth Quotes?" Journal of Finance 49,1813-1840.
  • 10Christie, William G., Jeffrey H. Harris, and Paul H. Schuhz, 1994b, "Why Did NASDAQ Market Makers Stop Avoiding Odd-Eighth Quotes?" Journal of Finance 49, 1841-1860.

共引文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部