摘要
"后马克思主义"与新葛兰西主义是两项互相联系而又不同的理论规划。葛兰西主义不仅是"后马克思主义"的理论来源,而且它的思想方法和概念形式在一定程度上被沉积到"后马克思主义"的理论构造之中。新葛兰西主义的"接合理论"本身潜伏着解除"接合"的外在限制的离散力,而接合概念的"后马克思主义化"就是这种离散力的直接后果;葛兰西把霸权视为一种接合过程,已经预示了一种语言政治学的新视域,而后马克思义的话语政治不过是葛兰西式的语言政治学的后结构主义处理;葛兰西一直强调霸权是对其它集团的意识形态原素的接合,在他看来,成功的政治是一种具有高度兼容性的政治,它能够从异己的、反己的力量中吸收增益性的成分从而大大拓展自己的存在空间,葛兰西这种观念被拉克劳与莫菲以一种独特的形式接合到"后马克思主义"的论述之中。
Post-Marxism and Neo-Gramscianism are related, though not exactly the same theoretical construct. Gramscianism is not only the theoretical source of post-Marxism, what＇s more, to a large extent, its method of thinking and conceptual form are deposited in the theoretical structuring of post-Marxism. Neo-Gramscianist theory of articulation contains latently the centrifugal force to escape any external restriction and the concept of articulation of post-Marxism results directly from such a centrifugal force. Gramsci views hegemony as an articulatory process, which already indicates a new perspective of linguistic politics. The discursive politics of post-Marxism is simply a poststructuralist transforming of linguistic politics; Gramsci has always emphasized that hegemony is the articulating of ideology of other groups. For him, successful politics has such a high compatibility that it is able to absorb beneficial elements from dissident powers or opposite powers so as to greatly expand its own territory. These Gramscian ideas are articulated by Laclau and Mouffe through a specific form into the post-Marxist discourse.
出处
《现代哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第6期42-49,共8页
Modern Philosophy
基金
中共中央编译局社科基金项目"国外后马克思主义理论研究"(批准号为05A02)的阶段性成果
国家博士后基金的资助(20060390673)
