期刊文献+

阻尼器和弹性索组合使用对大跨斜拉桥地震反应的影响 被引量:10

Seismic Performance Analysis of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges Using both Dampers and Elastic Cable
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以宁波象山港大桥为背景,研究阻尼器和弹性索组合使用对大跨斜拉桥地震反应的影响。建立了与一般冲刷、局部冲刷两种冲刷类型对应的主桥动力分析有限元模型,对多遇地震和罕遇地震下不同主梁纵向约束方式的主桥模型分别进行了非线性时程分析。通过对分析结果的比较发现:用阻尼器耗能的约束方式对于减小地震下斜拉桥的内力和位移响应都非常有效,减震效果优于单独采用弹性索的约束方式;阻尼器和弹性索组合使用与只采用阻尼器的约束方式相比,构件内力增大幅度很小,却可以更好地控制主梁的梁端位移。因此,在宁波象山港大桥主桥抗震设计中建议采用阻尼器和弹性索组合使用的减震方案。 This paper takes Ningbo Xiangshan Harbor Bridge as an example to study the seismic performance of long-span cable-stayed bridges with both dampers and elastic cable being used as longitudinal restraints of the main girder. The FEM dynamic analysis models were built for two different scouring depths, the nonlinear time history analysis was conducted for the FEM models with different longitudinal restraint conditions under common and rare earthquake. The seismic analysis results demonstrated that earthquake-induced inertial force and deformation response in key positions of the bridge can be reduced dramatically by using only dampers in the main girder, and the dampers are also more efficient than elastic cable in reducing earthquake-induced structural responses. Compared with the restraint condition of simply using dampers, using both dampers and elastic cable in the main girder can limit the deck displacement farther with negligible increase of inertial force response in key positions of the bridge. Therefore, both dampers and elastic cable are recommended as the longitudinal restraints of the main girder in the seismic design of Ningbo Xiangshan Harbor cable-stayed bridge.
出处 《结构工程师》 2008年第5期71-76,共6页 Structural Engineers
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAG04B01) 国家自然科学基金项目(50778131)
关键词 斜拉桥 抗震设计 弹性索 阻尼器 cable-stayed bridge, seismic design, elastic link device, damper
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献13

  • 1徐利平,张喜刚.苏通大桥主桥结构体系研究[M]∥苏通大桥建设指挥部.苏通大桥论文集:第一辑.北京:中国科学技术出版社,2004:70-75.
  • 2Wen-Hsiung Lin,Anil K Chopra.Earthquake response of elastic SDF systems with non-linear fluid viscous dampers[J].EESD,2002,31:1623.
  • 3Singh Mahendra P,ASCE F,Verma Navin P,et al.Seismic analysis and design with maxwell dampers[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2003,129(3):2003.
  • 4PRIESTLEY M J N,SEIBLE F,CALVI G M. Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges[M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1996.
  • 5王志强 胡世德 周红卫.卢浦大桥减、隔震装置的研究[A]..第十五届全国桥梁学术会议论文集[C].上海:同济大学出版社,2002.372-379.
  • 6项海帆 李瑞霖 杨昌众.悬浮体系斜张桥的近似抗震计算[J].结构工程师,1985,(2).
  • 7Eurocode 8:Structures in Seismic Regions Design[S],Part2:Bridges,April 1993
  • 8H.M. ALI and A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar. Seismic Energy Dissipation for Cable-Stayed Bridges Using Passive Devices [J]. E.E. S. D.,Vol. 23,1994
  • 9Charles Seim P. E. The Seismic Retrofit of the Golden Gate Bridge [A], PRC-US Workshop on seismic analysis and design of special bridges, Shanghai, October 2002
  • 10叶爱君,胡世德,范立础.斜拉桥抗震结构体系研究[J].桥梁建设,2002,32(4):1-4. 被引量:102

共引文献248

同被引文献61

引证文献10

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部