摘要
目的:评价在冠脉介入术后,穿刺动脉应用血管封堵器Angio-Seal止血或常规压迫止血的效果。方法:160例患者经股动脉介入术后,分为两组,A组42例应用Angio-Seal封堵器;B组118例应用常规压迫止血作为对照组。记录加压包扎时间,卧床时间及并发症。结果:加压包扎时间A组0小时,B组(6.65±1.36)小时;卧床时间A组(2.1±0.6)小时,B组(31.4±3.9)小时;并发症A组显著低于B组。结论:Angio-Seal闭合器与手压止血比较明显缩短了卧床时间,无明显的穿刺部位血管并发症,术后舒适度提高,方便了患者及医务工作者。
Objective：To compare the effect of angioseal closure or general compression applied to femoral artery puncture site after coronary interventions. Methods： 160 patients are divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 42 patients with angioseal clo- sure. Group B consisted of 118 patients with general compression. The sheath was removed immediately after coronary interventions in group A and the Angioseal closure was used for hemostasis. It was recorded that the time of pressed enswathe, keeping in bed, as well as the complications. Results： The time of pressed enswathe was A Group Oh,B Group （6.65 ±1.36 h） , and keeping in bed A was （2.1 ±0.6 h）, B was （31.4 ± 3.9 h）. A g complications was marked under B group, Conclusions： It is much better than general compression that the Angioseal device is an effective method to achieve immediate henastasis after coronary intervention and shorten bed rest time, and also reduce the vascular complications.
出处
《中国民康医学》
2008年第21期2477-2477,2479,共2页
Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
