期刊文献+

肿瘤标记物在FOLFIRI方案治疗晚期结直肠癌疗效评价中的意义

Serum Tumor Biomarkers in Evaluating the Effects of Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated with FOLFIRI
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清肿瘤标记物在FOLFIRI方案治疗晚期结直肠癌患者疗效评价中的意义。方法对50例确诊的晚期结直肠癌患者,采用FOLFIRI方案治疗,观察治疗前后患者血清肿瘤标记物TPS、CEA、CA199和CA242的动态变化和近期疗效。结果血清肿瘤标记物CEA、CA242和TPS水平RR组(CR+PR)化疗后显著减低(P<0.05),其中TPS降低最早,CEA则在治疗6~8周后才出现变化;4种肿瘤标记物评价与临床疗效评价的总一致性比较差异不显著(P>0.05);临床客观评价病情进展和有效率时(PD+RR)符合率比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。联合检测TPS、CEA和CA2423个指标,则总符合率为85.9%。结论TPS、CEA和CA242联合检测,对采用FOLFIRI方案治疗晚期结直肠癌患者的疗效评价有重要意义。 Objective To study the significance of serum tumor biomarkers in evaluating the effects of advanced colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI.Methods 50 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with FOLFIRI.The CEA,CA242,CA199 and TPS were measured before and after treatment.Results CEA,CA242 and TPS levels were significantly lowered in patients responded(CR+PR)to treatments(P〈0.05).TPS was the first biomarker to decrease,whereas CEA declination was occurred 6~8 weeks after treatment initiation.The correlation between the 4 tumor biomarkers evaluation and the clinical effect evaluation showed no statistically significant(P〉0.05),but their respective coincidences with the clinical objective evaluation of disease progression and the total response rate(RR+PD)differed significantly(P〈0.05).When combining the 3 indices of TPS,CEA and CA242,their total coincidence reached 85.9% with the clinical evaluation.Conclusion Monitoring the changes in serum CEA,TPS and CA242 levels may enhance the consistency of laboratory findings with the clinical evaluation of advanced colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI.
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2008年第6期586-589,共4页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 结直肠癌 肿瘤标记物 Colorectal cancer Tumor biomarkers
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Bae DJ, Splinter TAW, Kok TC, et al. Evaluation of CA 19-9 serum levels for monitoring disease activity during chemotherapy of pancreatic adenoeareinoma [J ]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 1991,117 : 263.
  • 2Koprowski H. Coloreetal earcital carcinoma antigens detected by hybridoma antibodies[ J]. Somat Cell Gen, 1979,5: 957.
  • 3Duffy, MJ Ann. Review of CA199 [ J]. Clin Bio chem, 1989, 26 : 379.
  • 4Haglund C,Lindgren J, Roberts PJ, et al. Tissue expression the tumor associated antigen CA242 in benign and malignant pancreatic lesions. A comparison with CAS0 and CA199 [ J]. Br J Cancer, 1989,60 : 845.
  • 5Kobayashi T, Kawa S, Tokoo M, et al. Comparative study CA50 (time-resoled fluoroimmunoassay), Spanl and CA199 the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer [ J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 1991,26 : 787.
  • 6Markus A,Rothin M, Helen J, et al. CA242 is a new tumor marker for pancreatic cancer[ J]. Cancer, 1993,71 : 701.
  • 7Kuusela P, Haglund C, Roberts PJ, et al. Comparison of a new tumor marker CA242 with CA19-9, CA50 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in digestive tract diseases [ J ]. Br J Cancer, 1991,63:636.
  • 8Banff G, Bravi S, Ardemagm A, et al. CA199, CA242 and CEA in the diagnosis and followup of pancreatic cancer [ J]. Int Biol Markers, 1996,11 (2) :77.
  • 9吴健雄 余宏迢 等.CEA和CA242在大肠癌诊断中的意义[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1995,17:438-438.
  • 10Markus A, Rothin M, Helen J, et al. CA242 is a new tumor marker for pancreatic cancer[ J]. Cancer, 1993,71 : 701.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部