期刊文献+

脊椎病变的MR弥散加权成像研究 被引量:7

Diffusion-weighted imaging of vertebral diseases
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的结合常规MRI,探讨磁共振弥散加权成像对脊椎良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值。方法选择64例脊椎良恶性病变患者为研究对象,应用1.5T磁共振扫描仪采集数据,包括常规T1WI、T2WI和DWI,DWI b值分别选择70 s/mm^2、100 s/mm^2、165 s/mm^2、300 s/mm^2、500 s/mm^2,经Functool 2软件分析处理得到病变部位的表观弥散系数(ADC)值和指数弥散系数(EDC)值。采用统计软件包(SPSS 13.0)对以上观察内容进行统计学分析。结果DWI中,脊椎良、恶性病变的信号差异无显著性。b≤100 s/mm^2时,弥散效应不明显;b>300 s/mm^2时,图像信-噪比过低。当b= 165 s/mm^2时,其图像可满足诊断需要。当b=165 s/mm^2时,脊椎良性病变的ADC值为(3.19±0.33)×10^(-4)mm^2/s,EDC值为(715.68±28.36)×10^(-3);脊椎恶性肿瘤(转移瘤)的ADC值为(1.87±0.12)×10^(-4)mm^2/s,EDC值为(1466.25±41.69)×10^(-3)。与恶性肿瘤相比,脊椎良性病变的ADC值明显偏高,EDC值明显偏低。结论脊椎良、恶性病变的DWI信号差异无显著性。因此,不能单纯根据DWI信号的高低对脊椎良、恶性病变进行鉴别诊断。脊椎EPI-DWI中,当b值在100~300 s/mm^2时,能够得到适合临床诊断需要的图像。当b=165 s/mm^2时,脊椎ADC值和EDC值可作为良恶性病变鉴别诊断的指标之一。若ADC值大、EDC值小,则提示病变良性可能较大;反之则提示恶性肿瘤可能。 Objective To evaluate the clinical application value of diffusion weighted imaging in differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral diseases. Methods Conventional MRI and DWI with b values as 70 s/mm^2 , 100 s/mm^2 , 165 s/mm^2 , 300 s/mm^2 and 500 s/mm^2 respectively were performed in 64 patients with vertebral disease. ADC and EDC values were obtained on delineated ROI by the Functool 2 software system. The data were analyzed with soft-ware (SPSS, version 13.0). Results There was no significant difference of signal of DWI between benign and malignant vertebral diseases. The diffusion effects was not significant when b value was smaller than 100 s/mm^2. The signal noise ratio was so low when b value was larger than 300 s/mm^2. With b value as 165 s/mm^2 , the diffusion images were suitable for clinical diagnosis. When b value was 165 s/mm^2 , the ADCs of benign vertebral diseases were higher than those of malignant ones ([(3.19±0.33) vs (1.87 ±0.12)] ×10^-4 mm^2/s), and EDCs of benign group were lower than those of malignant ones ([(715.68±28.36) vs (1466.25±41.69)] ×10^-3 ). Conclusion The signal of DWI is not reliable to distinguish benign from malignant vertebral diseases, however, ADCs and EDCs of diffusion weighted imaging are helpful for differentiation.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期1501-1504,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 脊椎病变 弥散加权成像 磁共振成像 Vertebra Diffusion weighted imaging Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1沈艳,李明华,姚伟武.磁共振成像新技术在脊柱病变中的应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(7):1137-1139. 被引量:3
  • 2Sotak CH. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of tissue water and its relationship to cell volume changes in pathological states. Neurochem Int, 2004,45(4):569-582.
  • 3张晓鹏.在宏观静止中感受微观运动:磁共振扩散加权成像临床应用的若干认识[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(12):1796-1798. 被引量:28
  • 4Yeung DK, Wong SY, Griffith JF, et al. Bone marrow diffusion in-osteoporosis: evaluation with quantitative MR diffusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2004,19(2) :222-228.
  • 5Raya JG, Dietrich O, Reiser MF, et al. Techniques for diffusion- weighted imaging of bone marrow. Eur J Radiol, 2005,55 (1) : 64- 73.
  • 6Eastwood JD, Vollmer RT, Provenzale JM. Diffusion-weighted imaging in a patient with vertebral and epidural abscesses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2002,23(3) : 496-498.
  • 7Bammer R, Herneth AM, Maier SE, et al. Line scan diffusion imaging of the spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003,24(1):5-12.
  • 8Mulkern RV, Schwartz RB. In re-characterization of benign and metastatic vertebral compression fractures with quantitative diffusion MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003,24 (7) : 1489- 90.
  • 9Chan JH, Ped WC, Tsui EY, et al. Acute vertebra body compression fractures:discrimination between benign and malignant causes using apparent diffusion coefficients. Br J Radiol, 2002,75(891): 207-214.
  • 10Zhou XJ, Leeds NE, McKinnon GC, et al. Characterization of benign and metastatic vertebral compression fractures with quantitative diffusion MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2002,23 (1) :165-170.

二级参考文献18

  • 1姚伟武,李明华,杨世埙,乔瑞华,何鸿渊.MR表观弥散系数定量测定对脊柱压缩性骨折病因的诊断价值研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2004,23(7):605-609. 被引量:24
  • 2Disler DG, McCauley TR, Ratner LM, et al. In-phase and out-of-phase MR imaging of bone marrow: prediction of neoplasia based on the detection of coexistent fat and water[J].AJR,1997,169(5):1439-1447.
  • 3Zampa V, Cosottini M, Michelassi MC, et al. Value of opposed-phase gradient-echo technique in distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral lesions[J].Eur Radiol,2002,12(7):1811-1818.
  • 4Eito K, Waka S, Naoko N, et al. Vertebral neoplastic compression fractures:assessment by dual-phase chemical shift imaging[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2004,20(6):1020-1024.
  • 5Baur A, Stable A, Brunning R, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow:differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures[J].Radiology,1998,207(2):349-356.
  • 6Le Bihan DJ.Differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: a closed step toward the "holy grail" of tissue characterization[J]?Radiology,1998,207(2):305-307.
  • 7Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK.Diffusion-weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases[J].AJNR,2000,21(5):948-953.
  • 8Zhou XJ, Leeds NE, McKinnon GC. Characterization of benign and metastatic vertebral compression fractures with quantitative diffusion MR imaging[J].AJNR,2002,23(1):165-170.
  • 9Byun WM, Shin SO, Chang Y. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of metastatic disease of the spine:assessment of response to therapy[J].AJNR,2002,23(6):906-912.
  • 10Bammer R, Andreas M, Herneth, et al. Line scan diffusion imaging of the spine[J].AJNR,2003,24(1):5-12.

共引文献29

同被引文献75

引证文献7

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部