摘要
[目的]对急性甲醇中毒所致的远视力损害进行分级,并将常规和综合2种方法治疗后的远视力情况及2个月后复查结果,进行前后对照分析。[方法]对27例54眼急性甲醇中毒者按现行诊断标准进行分级后,对各不同分级中毒者的远视力情况,使用视力损害分级(WHO,1973)标准进行分级。使用常规和综合方案于治疗前后进行远视力检查,其检查结果连同2个月后复查的相同项目进行前后对照,2种治疗方法进行统计学处理。[结果]常规和综合方案2种治疗方法比较,对于提高远视力,后者优于前者差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。视力≥1.0者,在常规、综合治疗和复查三者分别为0,51%和43%。[结论]综合治疗方案疗效优于常规方法,远视力的提高不是治愈的唯一标准。
[Objective]To classify the damage of distant vision caused by acute methanol poisoning , the effect of 2 treatment methods and the results of follow-up examination 2 months later were compared. [Methods]The damage of distant vision caused by methanol poisoning was classified based on the standard （WHO, 1973） for 27 patients. Distant vision was examined after and before treatment with 2 methods （ general and comprehensive treatment method）. The results and follow-up examination results 2 months later after treatment were compared and treated statistically. [Results]The treatment effect on distant vision with comprehensive method was better than that with general method. There was a difference （ P 〈0.01）. The distant vision was ≥1.0 among 0,51% and 43 % of the patients after treatment with general , compre-hensive method and follow-up examination. [Conclusion]The treatment effect with comprehensive method was better than that general method. The improvement of distant vision does not the only criterion of cure.
出处
《预防医学论坛》
2008年第11期969-971,共3页
Preventive Medicine Tribune
基金
广东省自然科学基金资助项目号(5001768)
关键词
甲醇中毒
视力损害
综合方案
Methanol poisoning
Damage of vision
Comprehensive method
