信息技术投资与公司绩效:基于中国上市公司的实证研究被引量：33

Information Technology Investment and Firms' Performance: An Empirical Study on Chinese Listed firms

下载PDF

导出

摘要随着公司将大量资金投入信息技术,研究人员和企业界对于信息技术投资价值问题给予越来越多的关注。已有的研究表明,信息技术投资并没有导致公司绩效的提高,存在所谓的信息技术投资"生产率悖论"问题。针对中国企业的信息技术投资与公司绩效关系进行研究,搜集了200多家上市公司1999年到2004年的财务数据。以生产理论为基础,把信息技术作为一种重要的生产投入资源,构造研究面板模型,利用广义最小二乘法对回归方程进行估计。研究表明,公司的信息技术投资,对主营收入、净利润等绩效指标具有积极的影响,信息技术投资是一种生产性投资,对产出具有积极的贡献。 With the increasing money input into information technology, researchers and businesses begin to pay more attention to the value of information technology investment. Researches have shown that information technology investment has not lead to higher firms＇ performance, there exists a so-called ＂productivity paradox＂ problem. This paper focuses on the relationship between information technology investment and firms＂ performance of Chinese have collected more than two hundred listed firms＂ public finance data covering a period from 1999 on production theory, considering information technology as an important input factor, we construc companies. We to 2004. Based t the panel data model, and employ GLS method to estimate coefficients of regression function. The result of this research shows information technology investment produces significant positive impact on operation income and net profit of firms formation technology investment is productive investment; it contributes positively to production output.

作者李治堂吴贵生

机构地区清华大学技术创新研究中心

出处《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第11期144-150,共7页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

关键词信息技术投资面板数据模型上市公司财务绩效 information technology investment panel data model listed firm financial performance

分类号 F270.3 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1Roach, S. S. America's Technology Dilemma: A Profile of the Information Economy. Special Economic Study [M].Morgan Stanley and Co., 1987.
2Berndt, E.R. & Morrison, C.J. Assessing the productivity of information technology equipment in the U.S.manufacturing industries[D]. Rsearch Working Paper, 1994:35-82.
3Loveman, G. W. An Assessment of the Productivity Impact on Information Technologies. Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s: Research Studies [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1994.
4Solow, R. M., Cohen, S. S. & Zysman, J. Manufacturing matters: The myth of the post-industrial economy [J]. New York Times Book Review, 1987(12).
5Roach, S. S. Technology and the services sector: The hidden competitive challenge [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1988, 34(4): 387-403.
6Bryjolfsson. The productivity pardox of information technology [J].Communications of the ACM, 1993, 36(12): 66-77.
7Brynjolfsson, E. The contribution of information technology to consumer welfare [J]. Information Systems Research, 1996, 7(3): 281-300.
8Rouben, Indjikian. and Donald, S. Siegel. The impact of in- vestment in IT on economic performance: Implications for developing countries [J]. World Development, 2005, 33(5): 681-700.
9Brynjolfsson and Hitt. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the return to information systems spending [J]. Management Science, 1996,42(4): 541-558.
10Santos, Peffers. and Mauer. The impact of information technology investment announcents on the market value of the firm [J]. Information System Research, 1993, 4(3): 1-23.