期刊文献+

川藏沿线兵站饮用水源水中重金属污染物健康风险评价 被引量:15

PRELIMINARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN DRINKING WATER FROM AFFILIATED ARMY SERVICE STATIONS ALONG SICHUAN-TIBET HIGHWAY
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的初步评价川藏沿线各兵站驻地生活饮用水源水中重金属污染物对人体健康产生的潜在危害。方法在对川藏沿线的18个兵站饮用水源水中砷(As)、铅(Pb)、汞(Hg)和硒(Se)4种重金属进行检测的基础上,建立水环境污染健康风险评价模型,并对重金属通过饮水途径所引起的健康风险作出初步评价。结果川藏沿线18个兵站水源水中As、Pb、Hg和Se的平均质量浓度分别为1.362×10-3mg/L、3.654×10-3mg/L、0.567×10-3mg/L和0.954×10-3mg/L。饮用水源水中致癌重金属As对人体健康危害的个人年风险为1.764×10-7/a^1.241×10-5/a;非致癌重金属Pb、Hg和Se所引起的健康危害的个人年风险水平集中在1×10-9/a^1×10-11/a,按风险大小排列为:As>Pb>Hg>Se。4种重金属对人体健康危害的年总风险达2.93×10-5/a。结论川藏沿线兵站4种重金属污染物对人体健康危害的个人年风险和总风险均低于国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)推荐的最大可接受值5.0×10-5/a,但应引起部队管理部门的重视。 Objective To explore the potential health hazards of heavy metals contamination in drinking water from 18 different army service stations. Methods The water environmental health risk assessment model recommended by US. EPA was established based on the water monitoring data of heavy metals. Results The median concentration of heavy metals in drinking water was 1. 362 ×10^-3mg/L for As, 3. 654 ×10^-3mg/L for Pb, 0. 567 ×10^-3mg/L for Hg, and 0. 954 ×10^-3 mg/L for Se. The health risk to the individual person per year in terms of As through drinking water ranged from 1.764 ×10^-7/a to 1. 241 ×10^-5/a. The health risk of non-carcinogenic heavy metals (Pb, Hg, Se) to the individual person ranged from 1 ×10^-9/a to 1 ×10^-11/a, and the greatest health risk to the individual through drinking was As, followed by Pb, Hg and Se. The total health risk caused by 4 heavy metals was 2.93 ×10^-5/a. Conclusion Although the environ- mental health risks caused by 4 heavy metals were lower than the maximum tolerable value (5.0 ×10^-4/a) recommended by ICRP, it should be also paid more attention by the military management.
出处 《解放军预防医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第5期321-324,共4页 Journal of Preventive Medicine of Chinese People's Liberation Army
关键词 川藏沿线 兵站 饮用水 重金属 健康风险评价 Sichuan.Tibet highway army service stations drinking water heavy metal health risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1NATIONAL RE.SEARCH COUNCIL. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government:Managing the Process[ M]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1983:2-273.
  • 2毛小苓,刘阳生.国内外环境风险评价研究进展[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2003,11(3):266-273. 被引量:159
  • 3US EPA. Superfund public health evaluation manual [S]. EPA/540/186060,1986.
  • 4US EPA. Supplement risk assessment Part 1. Guidance for public health risk assessment [S]. EPA. 601/5289-2001, 1989.
  • 5US EPA. Guidelines for health risk assessment of chemical mixtures[J]. Federal Register, 1986,51 (185) : 34014.
  • 6高继军,张力平,黄圣彪,马梅,王子健.北京市饮用水源水重金属污染物健康风险的初步评价[J].环境科学,2004,25(2):47-50. 被引量:245
  • 7KDRISHNAN K, PATERSON J, WILLIAMS D T. Health risk assessment of drinking water contaminants in Canada: the applicability of mixture risk assessment methods[J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 1997,25(2) : 179.
  • 8孙树青,胡国华,王勇泽,李诚.湘江干流水环境健康风险评价[J].安全与环境学报,2006,6(2):12-15. 被引量:86
  • 9耿福明,薛联青,陆桂华,吴义锋.饮用水源水质健康危害的风险度评价[J].水利学报,2006,37(10):1242-1245. 被引量:69
  • 10IARC (INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER) ,2004. IARC monograpks progranune on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Available at http:// monographs.iarc.fr/.

二级参考文献62

共引文献485

同被引文献163

引证文献15

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部