期刊文献+

焦虑障碍患者共病人格障碍的6个月随访调查 被引量:3

Six month Follow-up of Anxiety Disorders Co-morbid with Personality Disorders
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨人格障碍对焦虑障碍临床特点及对预后等的影响。方法对127例符合DSM-Ⅳ轴Ⅰ障碍定式临床检查(the structured clinical interviewfor diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.4th ed,SCID-Ⅰ)焦虑障碍的患者,予以DSM-Ⅳ轴Ⅱ障碍定式临床检查(the structured interview diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.4th ed,SCID-Ⅱ),评估其人格障碍,同时评估焦虑和抑郁水平,6个月后对其临床特点及治疗细节等进行再次评估。结果共病人格障碍的焦虑障碍患者较单纯焦虑障碍有更加严重的焦虑、抑郁状况,社会功能更差,治疗依从性差,预后差,对治疗满意度低,得到的社会支持少,更多的使用2种及2种以上抗焦虑抑郁药或合并使用其他抗精神病药,更倾向于选择多家医疗机构及多名医生就诊。结论焦虑障碍与人格障碍的共病率高,人格障碍对焦虑障碍影响明显,在接诊焦虑障碍患者时,应对其人格障碍给予充分的评估和处理。 Objective To get the influence of personality disorders on anxiety disorders. Methods One hundred and twenty seven out-patients with anxiety disorders were diagnosed with the structured clinical interview for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed (text revision) Axis Ⅰ (SCID-Ⅰ ) and their personality disorders were assessed with the structured clinical interview for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed SCID- Ⅱ Axis Ⅱ ( SCID- Ⅱ ). Moreover, all patients were assessed with the self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) , self-rating depression scale(SDS) , and followed for half year. Results Compared to anxiety disorders only, anxiety disorders with personality disorders had more severe symptoms, severe impaired social function, higher state of anxiety, worse prognosis, lower satisfaction for treatments, lower support from the society, easier to have been prescribed more than one anti-anxiety medication, anti-depression medication or anti-psychiatric medications, and easier to visit more doctors. Conclusion The high co-morbid rate of anxiety disorders with personality disorders influence the anxiety disorders greatly, personality disorders should be given more attention and assessed sufficiently when doctors are confronted with anxiety disorders patients.
出处 《首都医科大学学报》 CAS 2008年第5期547-551,共5页 Journal of Capital Medical University
关键词 焦虑障碍 人格障碍 共病 anxiety disorder personality disorder co-morbidity
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders [ M ]. 4th ed Text Revision, Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
  • 2Sanderson W C, Wetzler S, Beck A T, et al. Prevalence of personality disorders among patients with anxiety disorders [J]. Psychiatry. Res, 1994,51:167-174.
  • 3Oldham J M, Skodol A E, Kellman H D. Comorbidity of axis Ⅰand axis Ⅱ disorders[J]. Am J Psychiatry, 1995, 152:571-578.
  • 4Sareen J, Stein M B, Cox B J, et al. Understanding comorbidity of anxiety disorders with antisocial behavior: findings from two large community surveys [ J ]. J Nerv Ment Dis, 2004,192 : 178-186.
  • 5Gokalp P G, Tukel R, Solmaz D, et al. Clinical features and co-morbidity of social phobics in Turkey [ J ]. Eur Psychiatry, 2001,16:115-121.
  • 6Marteinsdottir I, Furmark T, Tillfors M, et al. Personality traits in social phobia[J]. Eur Psychiatry, 2001,16: 143- 150.
  • 7王丽颍 杨蕴萍.SAD与人格障碍的共病及父母养育方式的影响.中国行为医学科学,2004,13:232-233.
  • 8Denys D, Tenney N, van Megen H J, et al. Axis Ⅰ and Ⅱ comorbidity in a large sample of patients with obsessive- compulsive disorder [ J ]. J Affect Disord, 2004,80 : 155- 162.
  • 9Grant B F, Hasin D S, Stinson F S, et al. Co-occurrence of 12-month mood and anxiety disorders and personality disorders in the US: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions [ J]. J Psychiatr Res, 2005,39:1-9.
  • 10戴云飞,肖泽萍,王振,张海音,陈珏,邹政,何燕玲,赵介城,张明园.人格障碍诊断问卷(SCID-Ⅱ)第2版的信度和效度[J].上海精神医学,2006,18(1):1-4. 被引量:58

二级参考文献12

  • 1Becker DF,Grilo CM,Morey LC,et al.Applicability of personality disorder criteria to hospitalized adolescents:evaluation of internal consistency and criterion overlap.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,1999,38:200-205.
  • 2Grilo CM,McGlashan TH,Morey LC,et al.Internal consistency,intercriterion overlap and diagnostic efficiency of criteria sets for DSM -Ⅳ schizotypal,borderline,avoidant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.Acta Psychiatr Scand,2001,104:264 -272.
  • 3Maffei C,Fossati A,Agostoni I,et al.Interrater reliability and internal consistency of structured clinical interview for DSM-Ⅳ axis Ⅱ personality disorder (SCID-Ⅱ),version 2.0.J Personal Disord,1997,11(3):279-84.
  • 4Mark Z.Diagnosing personality disorders:a review of issues and research methods.Arch G en Psychiatry,1994,51:225 -245.
  • 5Osone A,Takahashi S.Twelve month test-retest reliability of a Japanese version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-Ⅳ personality disorder.Psychiatry Clin Neurosci,2003,57 (5):532-8.
  • 6Arntz A,van Beijsterveldt B,Hoekstra R,et al.The interrater reliability of a Dutch version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM -Ⅲ-R Personality Disorders.Acta Psychiatr Scand,1992,85:394-400.
  • 7Del-Ben CM,Rodrigues CR,Zuardi AW.Reliability of the Portuguese version of the structured clinical interview for DSM-Ⅲ-R (SCID) in a Brazilian sample of psychiatric outpatients.Braz J Med Biol Res,1996 Dec,29(12):1675 -82.
  • 8Villar-Garcia M,Perez-Prieto JF,Hernandez-Viadel M,et al.Preparation of a SCID-Ⅱ-based diagnostic tool for personality disorders.Spanish version.Translation and adaptation.Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines,1995,23(4):178 -83.
  • 9Skodol AE,Rosnick L,Kellman D,et al.Validating structured DSM-Ⅲ-R personality disorder assessments with longitudinal data.Am J Psychiatry,1988,145:1297-1299.
  • 10Pilkonis PA,Heape CL,Ruddy J,et al.Validity in the diagnosis of personality disorder:the use of the LEAD standard.Psychol Assess J Consult Clin Psychol,1991,3:46 -54.

共引文献57

同被引文献44

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部