摘要
在文化与法律移植的关系问题上,存在文化进化论与文化传播论、法律自治论与法律镜像论以及法律实效论与法律符号论之争,上述立场各有偏颇,因而需要重构新的理论范式。在初民社会,文化与法律融为一体,法律不可移植;在国家产生之后,政治因素开始影响法律移植,但是文化的作用不可低估;在民族国家阶段,政治因素对法律移植的影响开始强化,而文化对法律移植的影响渐趋减弱;至全球化时代,文化对法律移植的影响进一步弱化,出现了三种穿越不同文化的法律移植类型,因而需要运用新的范式思考和解释文化与法律移植之间的关系。
There are debates between different schools of legal theories, such as cultural evolution vs. cultural dissemination, legal autonomy vs. mirror image of law, and efficacy of law vs. symbolism of law, over the issue of the relationship between culture and transplantation of law. All of the above-mentioned schools are biased on this issue and, therefore, a new theory needs to be constructed. In the primitive society, culture and law were integrated and law was not transplantable. After the emergence of states, political factors began to influence the transplantation of law, but the role of culture was still not be underestimated; at the stage of nation state, the influence of political factors began to be strengthened and the influence of culture gradually weakened. At the time of globalization, the influence of culture on the transplantation of law is further weak- ened and three models of trans-cultural transplantation of law have emerged. As a result, a new theory is needed to interpret the relationship between culture and transplantation of law.
出处
《环球法律评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第5期5-14,共10页
Global Law Review
基金
华东政法学院国际法律与比较法研究中心重点课题“全球化背景下的法律移植--新语境、新趋势与新范式”(批准号07GBZ1)的资助
