期刊文献+

罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼用于无痛分娩50例分析 被引量:7

The analysis of 50 cases of analgesic labor with ropivacaine and sufentanyl
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼用于无痛分娩的效果、并发症及对产程和新生儿阿普加评分的影响。方法回顾2007年50例罗哌卡因配合舒芬太尼椎管内麻醉行无痛分娩的病例资料,并随机选取同期50例未行无痛分娩的产妇作为对照组,对比2组产妇的剖宫产率、疼痛程度、产程、新生儿的阿普加评分,观察无痛分娩组的不良反应。结果无痛分娩组剖宫产率低于对照组;疼痛方面,分娩过程中无痛分娩组疼痛明显轻于对照组,但缝合会阴切口时2组差别无显著性;对产程影响方面,活跃期无痛分娩组短于对照组,而第二产程无痛分娩组长于对照组;新生儿阿普加评分2组间差别无显著性;不良反应方面,宫缩乏力100%(50/50),皮肤瘙痒80%(40/50),尿潴留30%(15/50),余未发现明显并发症。结论罗哌卡因、舒芬太尼椎管内麻醉行无痛分娩效果确切,安全,但应注意宫缩乏力、皮肤瘙痒、尿潴留等不良反应及对产程的影响。 Objective To explore the effect, complications and the influence on labor and the Apgar score of newborns of analgesic labor with ropivacaine and sufentanyl. Methods 50 cases of analgesic labor with ropivacaine and sufentanyl in 2007 were looked back to,50 parturients without analgesic labor in the same period was chosen as comparison group randomly. The cesarean section rate, degree of pain,labor and the apgar score of newborns between the two groups were compared, and the side effects of the analgesic labor group were observed. Results The cesarean section rate of the analgesic labor group was lower;the degree of pain during labor of the analgesic labor group was lower, but there was no significant difference between the two groups when stitching the incision. Compared to the comparison group, the active stage of the analgesic labor group was shorter,yet the second stage of labor was longer. There was no significant difference in the Apgar score of newborns between the two groups. The side effects of the analgesic labor group as following: uterine inertia100% (50/ 50), itch80% (40/50) ,urinary retention30% (15/50). Conclusion It is effective and safe to perform analgesic labor with ropivacaine and sufentanyl, but the side effects such as uterine inertia, iteh and urinary retention and the influence on the labor should be paid more attention.
出处 《中国实用医药》 2008年第27期42-44,共3页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 罗哌卡因 舒芬太尼 无痛分娩 Ropivaeaine, Sufentanyl, Analgesic labor
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献15

  • 1刘继云,李荣胜,吴为玲,佘守章,张玉洁,杨美英,邓玲红.舒芬太尼用于分娩镇痛的临床研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2004,39(10):700-701. 被引量:111
  • 2罗莹莹,陶芳标,胡传来,翟勇,余霞玲,苏普玉,徐海玉,曲荣.社会因素剖宫产婴儿的智力、运动发育及气质评定[J].中国全科医学,2005,8(1):19-21. 被引量:28
  • 3张义长,朱耀民,赵新京,叶平安.不同浓度罗比卡因术后硬膜外镇痛效果的观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(2):103-104. 被引量:45
  • 4Meister GC,D'Angelo R,Owen M,et al.A comparison of epidural analgesia with 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor.Anesth Analg,2000,90(3):632-637.
  • 5Meister GC,Angelo RD,Owen M,et al.A comparison of epidural analgesia with 0. 125% ropivacaine with fentanil versus 0. 125%bupivacain with fentanyl during labor[].Anesthesia and Analgesia.2000
  • 6Gaiser RR,Venkateswaren P,Cheek TG,et al.Comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia for labor and vaginal delivery[].Journal of Clinical Anesthesia.1997
  • 7Fischer C,Blanie P,Jaouen E,et al.Ropivacaine, 0. 1%, plus sufentanil, 0. 5μg ml versus bupivacaine, 0. 1% , plus sufentanil 0. 5μg ml, using patient-controlled epidural analgersia for labor: a double-blind comparison[].Anesthesiology.2000
  • 8Campbell DC,Zwack R M,Crone LL,et al.Ambulatory labor epidural analgesia: bupivacaine versus ropivacaine[].Anesthesia and Analgesia.2000
  • 9Macarthur A,Macarthur C,Weeks S,et al.Epidural anaesthesia and low back pain after delivery: a prospective cohort study[].British Medical Journal.1995
  • 10徐键,陈亚侠,石一复.社会因素对剖宫产率的影响[J].医学与哲学,2000,21(4):14-16. 被引量:30

共引文献101

同被引文献38

引证文献7

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部