期刊文献+

S弯扩压器中四种湍流模型的比较 被引量:6

Comparison of four turbulence models in diffusing S-duct
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用Realizableκ-ε,S-A(Spalart-Allmaras),SST(Shear stress transport剪切应力输运),RSM(Reynolds stress equation model雷诺应力模型)四种湍流模型对S弯扩压器内的分离流动进行了模拟,分析了不同湍流模型对计算结果的影响.将不同轴向位置的表面压力系数、分离区的大小、马赫数等三个量的实验值与计算值进行了比较,结果表明:分离区湍流模型对表面压力分布影响较大,未分离区不同湍流模型模拟精度相当;S-A模型对分离区的模拟较保守,RSM模型对分离的模拟精度较高,SST与RSM模拟结果很接近;各湍流模型计算的高速区域均比实验值大.扩压器的平均总压恢复系数受湍流模型影响不大,和实验结果吻合较好. Four turbulence models: Realizable κ-ε , S-A(Spalart Allmaras), SST(Shear stress transport) and RSM(Reynolds stress equation model), were compared by simulating separated flow in a diffusing S-duct. The numerical results show the capability of each turbulence model in dealing with separation. Before separation, the predicted results agree well with experiment for four models, but in separated region, the turbulence model has impor tant effect in simulating separation. SST model is compared to RSM in simulating separation and pressure coefficient, however not as clearly as RSM. S A model under predict the separation and the separated region is smaller than experiment. Maeh number is higher than experimental data for four models. Pressure recoveries are similar for different models, and are within 0.7% agreement with experimental data.
出处 《航空动力学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期1888-1891,共4页 Journal of Aerospace Power
关键词 湍流模型 S弯扩压器 Realizable κ-ε S-A(Spalart-Allmaras) SST(Shear stress transport剪切应力输送) RSM(Reynolds stressequation model雷诺应力模型) turbulence model diffusing S-duct Realizable κ-ε S-A(Spalart-Allmaras) SST (Shear stress transport) RSM (Reynolds stress equation model )
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1杨永,段毅,张强.超声速大迎角分离流中三种湍流模型的比较研究[J].空气动力学学报,2006,24(3):371-374. 被引量:7
  • 2肖志祥,李凤蔚.三种湍流模型模拟能力的对比[J].西北工业大学学报,2002,20(3):351-355. 被引量:7
  • 3Spalart P R, Allmaras S R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows[R]. AIAA 92-0439.
  • 4Shih T H. Liou W W, Shabbir A, et al. A newge eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number lurhulent flows [J]. Comput Fluids, 1995,24(3):227-238.
  • 5Wellborn S R, Reichert B A. Okiishi T H. An experimental investigation of the flow in a diffusing S ducl [R]. A1AA-92- 3622.
  • 6Harloff G J, Reichert B A. Wellborn S R. Xavier Stokes analysis and cxperimental data comparison of compressible flow in a diffusingS duct [R]. AIAA 92 2699.
  • 7Reichert B A, Wendt B J. Improving diffusing S duct per formancc by secondary flow control [R] AIAA 9.1 0365

二级参考文献13

  • 1[1]Rumsey C L. A Comparison of Predictive Capabilities of Several Turbulence Models Using Upwind and Central-Difference Computer Codes. AIAA Paper 93-0192, 1993
  • 2[2]Sturek W B, et al. The Application of CFD to the Prediction of Missile Body Vortices. AIAA Paper 97-0637, 1997
  • 3[3]Swanson R C, Turkel E. On Central-Difference and Upwind Schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 1992, 101: 292~306
  • 4[4]Baldwin B S, Lomax H. Thin Layer Approximation and Algebraic Model for Separated Turbulent Flows. AIAA Paper 78-257, 1978
  • 5[5]Abid R, Vatsa V N, Johnson D A, Wedan B W. Prediction of Separated Transonic Wing Flows with Nonequilibrium Algebraic Turbulence Model. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28(8): 1426~1431
  • 6[6]Johnson D A. Nonequilibrium Algebraic Turbulence Modeling Considerations for Transonic Airfoils and Wings. AIAA Paper 92-0026, 1992
  • 7[7]Josyula E. Computational Study of High-Angle-of-Attack Missile Flows Using Two-Equation Turbulence Models.AIAA Paper 98-0525, 1998
  • 8ESWAR JOSYULA.Computational study of high-attack-angle missile flows using two-equations turbulence models[R].AIAA97-0525,1997.
  • 9WALTER B STUREK.The application of CFD to the prediction of missile body vortices[R].AIAA 97-0637,1997.
  • 10LIOU Meng-Sing.A further development of the AUSM +scheme towards robust and accurate solutions for all speeds[R].AIAA 2003-4116,2003.

共引文献12

同被引文献40

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部