摘要
目的:对肿节风的不同提取方法进行比较研究。方法:采用冷浸提取、渗漉提取、回流提取、连续回流提取、超声提取、微波萃取六种不同的方法进行提取,并对提取物的收率进行比较,同时以富马酸含量为考察指标进行含量测定。结果:采用六种不同的提取方法提取所得提取物的收率及有效成分的含量有较大的差异,其中回流提取及连续回流提取所得提取物的收率相对较高,而超声提取及微波萃取所得提取物中有效成分的含量相对较高。结论:与其它方法相比,微波提取法具有提取快速,节省时间、溶剂和能源,所提取的有效成分含量较高等优点。
Objective ： To compare the different extraction methods of Sarcandra glabra （Thunb.） Nakai. Methods ： To compare the yield of extraction and determination content of extraction by 6 kinds of different extraction methods as cold-soaked extraction, percoIation extraction, reflux extraction, continuous reflux extraction, ultrasonic extraction and microwave extraction, and the content of furmaric acid was determinated as index. Results： The yields of extraction and contents of availability component were very different through 6 kinds of different extraction methods. Among them, the yields of reflux extraction and continuous reflux extraction were higher, the contents of availability components of ultrasonic extraction and microwave extraction were higher. Conclusion： Microwave extraction method is better than other methods. It is fast economical, solvent and energy, and also has higher yield of availability component.
出处
《中药材》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2008年第9期1415-1418,共4页
Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials
基金
浙江省科技厅重点科技计划项目(2006C23008)
关键词
肿节风
微波萃取
富马酸
含量测定
Sarcandra glabra （Thunb.） Nakai
Extraction of microwave
Furmaric acid
Determination of content
