期刊文献+

两种前列腺外周带ADC值测量方法的效能比较 被引量:8

Impact of different methods for apparent diffusion coefficient measurement on diagnosis of peripheral zone of prostate
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的研究两种ADC值测量方法的差异及测量个体间差异,评价两种方法对前列腺外周带癌的诊断效能差异。方法54例前列腺病例进行DWI扫描,非癌31例,外周带癌23例。采用两种方法分别测量外周带ADC值。第一种方法:大小为30mm2左右的圆形感兴趣区(ROI),放置于外周带ADC值最低处,每层图像右叶、左叶各放一个;第二种方法:沿外周带边缘手工绘制不规则形ROI,每层图像分别绘制右叶及左叶两个ROI。对ADC值诊断前列腺癌的效能进行ROC分析。在54例研究对象中随机抽取12例,由两位医师采用两种方法分别测量,以Bland-Altman分析检验不同测量者间的个体差异。结果54例患者两种方法各获得549个ROI。第二种方法所得ADC值明显大于第一种方法,两种ADC值的相关系数为0.958。两种方法的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.856和0.850,无统计学差异,但诊断临界点有较大差异,第二种方法大于第一种方法。12例患者两种方法各获得123个ROI,两位医师之间的重复性好,且第二种方法重复性稍好于第一种方法。结论两种不同的ADC值测量方法所得数值有一定差异,但对前列腺外周带癌的诊断效能影响不大,其中第一种方法操作简单而第二种方法重复性稍好。 Objective To evaluate the differences between the two methods of ADC values measurement and to investigate the diagnostic values in the prostate cancer(PCa)in peripheral zone.Methods DWI scans were performed to 54 patients among which 31 were non-cancerous and 23 had PCa.Two methods for measuring ADC values were employed.Method one:round region of interest(ROI)areas about 30 mm2 were placed at peripheral zone with lowest ADC value.Method two:the whole volumes of the unilateral peripheral zones were measured using a freehand method on the ADC map.The diagnostic efficacy of ADC value in PCa was evaluated by ROC analysis.Twelve patients were selected to test the interobserver variance by Bland-Altman analysis.Results All of 549 ROIs were obtained by two methods.The ADC values of method two were significantly higher than the ones of method one with a corelation coefficient of 0.958.The ROC areas were 0.856 and 0.850 for the two methods with no statistic difference.But the diagnostic cut point of method two is higher than method one.The interobserver reproducibility is good with method two better than method one.Conclusion The ADC values obtained by the two methods were different but had no significant impact on the diagnosis of PCa.Method one was easier while method two has better reproducibility.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第8期1236-1239,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 2007年度高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金新教师项目(20070001748)
关键词 前列腺 磁共振成像 扩散加权成像 Prostate Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion-weighted imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Shimofusa R, Fujimoto H, Akamata H, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer. Journal of Computed Assisted Tomography, 2005,29(2) :149 153.
  • 2郭雪梅,王霄英,李飞宇,许玉峰,肖江喜,蒋学祥.前列腺磁共振扩散加权成像的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(12):1858-1861. 被引量:14
  • 3Pilatus U, Shim H, Artemov D, et al. Intracellular volume and apparent diffusion constants of perfused cancer cell cultures, as measured byNMR. MagnReson Med, 1997,37(6):825-832.
  • 4Bilgili Y, Unal B. Effect of region of interest on interobserver variance in apparent diffusion coefficient measures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2004,25 (1) : 108-111.
  • 5Mazziotta JC, Pelizzari CC, Chen GT, et al. Region of interest is sues: the relationship between structure and function in the brain Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 1991, 11 ( 1 ) : A5 -56.
  • 6Ozsunar Y, Koseogluk, Huisman TA. et al. MRI measurements of water diffusion: impact of region of interest selection on ischemic quantification. European Journal of Radiology, 2004, 51(3): 195-201.
  • 7Higano S, Yun X, Kumabe T, et al, Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis. Radiology, 2006( 10), 241:839-846.
  • 8Issa B. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002,16(2) :196-200.
  • 9Manenti G, Squillaci M, Di Roma M, et al. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissue using thin-slice echo-planar imaging. Radiol Med,2006,111(12):1124-1133.
  • 10陈卉.Bland-Altman分析在临床测量方法一致性评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(3):308-309. 被引量:220

二级参考文献8

共引文献246

同被引文献90

引证文献8

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部