摘要
用循证医学证据指导股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗决策,在权威评价系统中查询最佳证据。结果显示,外固定架和髁-头型钉不适用粗隆间骨折;DHS具有明显优势;不能证明人工关节置换和内固定何者占优。提示应用循证医学证据指导股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗决策,可以对患者实施个体化治疗。
To direct the treatment decision-making of the intertrochanteric femoral fractures with evidence-based medicine （EBM） proof. The beat evidence was inquired in authoritative evaluation system. External fixators and condylocephalic nails were not appropriate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures;DHS is obviously advanced in intertrochanteric femoral fractures. There was insufficient evidence that could prove which was more suitable between replacement arthroplasty and internal fixation. Appling the EBM evidence to direct the treatment decision making of intertrochanteric femoral fractures we can perform individual treatments for different patients.
出处
《医学与哲学（B）》
2008年第9期39-41,共3页
Medicine & Philosophy(B)
关键词
循证医学
股骨粗隆间骨折
临床决策
evidence- based medicine, intertrochanteric femoral fracture, clinical decision
