期刊文献+

An Approach for Handling Conflicts in Authorization

An Approach for Handling Conflicts in Authorization
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Based on logic programs, authorization conflicts and resolution strategies are analyzed through the explanation of some examples on the health care sector. A resolution scheme for handling conflicts in high level authorization specification by using logic program with ordered disjunction (LPOD) is proposed. The scheme is useful for solving conflicts resulted from combining positive and negative authorization, complexity of authorization management, and less clarity of the specification. It can well specify kinds of conflicts (such as exceptional conflicts, potential conflicts), and is based on literals and dependent contexts. Thus it is expressive and available. It is shown that authorizations based on rules LPOD is very important both in theory and practice. Based on logic programs, authorization conflicts and resolution strategies are analyzed through the explanation of some examples on the health care sector. A resolution scheme for handling conflicts in high level authorization specification by using logic program with ordered disjunction (LPOD) is proposed. The scheme is useful for solving conflicts resulted from combining positive and negative authorization, complexity of authorization management, and less clarity of the specification. It can well specify kinds of conflicts (such as exceptional conflicts, potential conflicts), and is based on literals and dependent contexts. Thus it is expressive and available. It is shown that authorizations based on rules LPOD is very important both in theory and practice.
出处 《Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences》 CAS 2008年第5期626-630,共5页 武汉大学学报(自然科学英文版)
基金 the National Natural Science Foundation of China (60573009,90718009)
关键词 AUTHORIZATION authorization conflict conflict resolution schema logic program with ordered disjunction authorization authorization conflict conflict resolution schema logic program with ordered disjunction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Cuppens F,,Cuppens-Boulahia N,Ghorbel B M.High Level Conflict Management Strategies in Advanced Access Control Models[].Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Sci- ence.2007
  • 2Benferhat S,Baida R E I,Cuppens F.A Stratification-Based Approach for Handling Conflicts in Access Control[].Proc of th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Tech- nologies (SACMAT‘).2003
  • 3Cuppens F,Cholvy L,Saurel C, et al.Merging Regulations: Analysis of a Practical Example[].International Journal ofIntelligent Systems.2001
  • 4Chomicki J,Lobo J,Naqvi S.A Logical Programming Ap- proach to Conflict Resolution in Policy Management. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu./chomicki00l ogic.html . 2007
  • 5Bertino E,Catania B,Ferrari E, et al.A Logical Framework for Reasoning about Access Control Models[].ACM Trans- actions on Information and System Security.2003
  • 6Bertino E,Catania B,Ferrari E, et al.On Comparing the Expressing Power of Access Control Model. http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~andrei/FCS04/ber- tino. ppt . 2006
  • 7Brewka G,Niemel- I,Syrj-nen T.Logic Programs with Or- dered Disjunction[].Computational Linguistics.2004
  • 8Barker S.Action-status Access Control[].Proc of Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies SACMAT’.2007
  • 9Jajodia,S.,Samarati,P.,Sapino,M.L.,Subrahmanian,V.S.Flexible Support for Multiple Access Control Policies[].ACM Transactions on Database Systems.2001
  • 10Moffett J D,Sloman MS.Policy Conflict Analysis in Distributed System Management[].Journal of Organisational Computing.1994

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部