摘要
改革开放以来,我国史学界的西欧中世纪史研究经历了一个不断拓展与深化的历程。在这一历程中,我们对唯物史观进行了正本清源,引进和借鉴西方史学的理论与方法,注重史料的搜集和翻译。同时,也对封建西欧的经济、政治、宗教、文艺复兴等方面的历史现象进行了多层次、多角度的研究,并运用本土的学术资源进行中西比较,还就某些问题展开争论。所有这些,都取得了前所未有的可喜成就。不过,我们的研究还处在一个初始阶段,存在着一些明显的甚至是严重的缺陷,与欧美同行的差距甚大。要使我们的研究水平显著提升,首先,必须努力克服语言关,培养能够运用原始资料来进行研究的学术群体;其次,必须全面梳理西方的相关学术史,为研究提供全面的参照;再次,还必须克服对西方史学的路径依赖,构建中国式的学术理路。唯有如此,我们的西欧中世纪史研究才能跻身于国际史坛。
Since Reform and Opening_up academic researches on Medieval history of Western Europe has constantly experienced an expanding and deepening process in China. In this process, we traced back sources to justify the foundation of Historical Materialism and drew on the western historical theory and method, and paid much attention to collecting and translating the historical materials. At the same time, we studied economy, politics, religion, Renaissance and other historical phenomena of feudal Western Europe from multi-levels and multi-angles, We also made comparative studies of history between China and the West by using domestic academic resources, and debated some i,sues. Achievements we have made in these fields are unprecedented. However, there are some serious shortcomings in our research which is still in an initial stage. There is a wide gap between our researches and European and American counterparts. In order to improve greatly our studying level, we must break the language barrier and cultivate the academic groups that can use firsthand materials. In addition, we also should check up overall the related academic trends of the West, so as to refer to them comprehensitively. Finally, we also must abandon our Path-Dependence on West historiography and build Chinese scholatic logic. Only by thiS, can we stand up in the academic circles of the international historiography.
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第9期5-17,共13页
Journal of Historical Science
关键词
改革开放
西欧中世纪史
经济史
政治史
文艺复兴
历史比较研究
Reform and Opening_ up
Medieval history of Western Europe
economy history
political history
Kenaissance
Comparative research in history
