期刊文献+

D-S证据理论中冲突证据的合成方法 被引量:77

Combination of Conflict Evidences in D-S Theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对高度冲突证据的合成问题,分析了D-S合成方法及其改进方法的不足,提出了一种新的改进方法。新方法仍利用D-S合成公式,但针对该公式要求参与合成的各证据需具有相同重要程度的要求,考虑到融合系统中各证据的重要程度可能不同,直接利用公式合成可能得到与实际相悖的结论,因而引入证据权的概念,给出了证据权的具体算法,通过证据权对已有的基本可信度分配函数进行修正得到了重要性相同的新的证据的基本可信度分配模型。最后通过算例比较表明新方法的合成结果更为理想。 D-S combination rule and other modified methods are defective in resolving evidence combination problem of highly conflict evidences. So we propose a new modified method. The new method still uses the D-S combination rule. All evidences must have the same important degree when they are combined with D-S combination rule. In practice, evidences may have different important degree so we maybe get paradoxical result if we directly combine these evidences. Therefore we introduce a concept of evidence weight and give the concrete algorithm for the evidence weight. Then new evidences with the same evidence weight can be got by modifying the basic belief assignment function of primary evidences through the algorithm to the evidence weight. Finally, an example indicates that the new method can give the more reasonable combination results compared with D-S combination rule and the other modified methods.
出处 《电子科技大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期701-704,共4页 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
基金 部级预研项目
关键词 证据合成 证据理论 证据权 多传感器数据融合 evidence combination evidence theory evidence weight multi-sensor data fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1DEMPSTER A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping[J]. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38(4): 325-339.
  • 2SHAFER G A. Mathematical theory of evidence[M]. Princeton N J: Princeton University Press, 1976: 19-63.
  • 3ZADEH L A. Review of books: A mathematical theory of evidence[J]. AI Magazine, 1984, 5(3): 81-83.
  • 4SMETS E The combination of evidence in the transferable belief method[J]. IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1990, 12(5): 447-458.
  • 5YAGER R R. On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules[J]. Information Sciences, 1987, 41(2): 93-137.
  • 6孙全,叶秀清,顾伟康.一种新的基于证据理论的合成公式[J].电子学报,2000,28(8):116-119. 被引量:453
  • 7LEFEVRE E, COLOT O, VANNOORENBERGHE P, et al. A generic framework of resolving the conflict in the combination of belief structures[C]//In: Proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Information Fusion. Paris: ISIF, 2000.
  • 8HAENNI R. Are alternatives to Dempster's rule of combination real alternatives: comments on "about the belief function combination and the conflict management problem"[J]. Information Fusion, 2002, 3(4): 237-239.
  • 9MURPHY C K. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000, 29(1): 1-9.
  • 10JOUSSELME A L, DOMINIC G. BOSSE E. A new distance between two bodies of evidenee[J]. Information Fusion, 2001, 2(2): 91-101.

二级参考文献3

  • 1[1]Ronald R.Yager.On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules[J].Information Sciences,1987,41:93-137.
  • 2[2]G.Shafer.A mathematical theory of evidence[M].Princeton U.P.,Princeton,1976.
  • 3[3]A.P.Dempster.Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping[J].Ann.Math.Statist.1967,38:325-339.

共引文献452

同被引文献691

引证文献77

二级引证文献522

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部