期刊文献+

供需中的Hockey-stick现象分析及对策研究 被引量:1

Analysis & countermeasures for"Hockey stick"phenomenon between supply and demand
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 许多公司的产品需求在连续而固定的周期会出现前低后高,即 Hockey-stick 现象,这种现象普遍存在于供应链之中并困扰着许多的企业管理者.不认为其产生的原因是公司对销售人员的周期性考评的传统观点,并以快速消费品行业为背景,通过建立模型,得出了这种现象主要是公司普遍采用的总量折扣(Volume Discounts)价格政策导致的结论,并提出了公司可以通过多产品组合定价等方法缓和这个问题,最后通过一个实例证实了文章的观点. Many companies experience regular surges in demand during continual time periods with fixed peri- od length, which is referred to as "Hockey stick" phenomenon. In the early stage of a time period, the de- mand is low, while the demand is high at the end of the time period. This phenomenon is quite prevalent in supply chains, which puzzles many managers. In the traditional viewpoint, the phenomenon is due to the fact that salespeople are regularly measured. However, this paper does not agree on above viewpoint. In the con- text of fast consumer products, a model is proposed to prove that the reason for the phenomenon is the price policy of volume discounts, which is popularly employed in industry. Then, the methods of muhiple products compounding pricing policy are proposed to mitigate the problem. Finally, our model and methods are valida- ted by a case study.
机构地区 华中科技大学
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期112-124,共13页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70672040) 国家863计划资助项目(2006AA04Z153) 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70332001)
关键词 Hockey—stick现象 周期性考评 总量折扣 需求扭曲 "Hockey stick" phenomenon periodic measurement volume discounts demand distortion
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1Lee H L, Padmanabhan P, Whang S. The bullwhip effect in supply chains[ J]. Sloan Management Review, 1997, 38 (3) : 93--102.
  • 2Munson C L, Rosenblatt M J. Theories and realities of quantity discounts: An exploratory study[ J]. Production and Operations Management, 1998, 7( 1 ) : 352--369.
  • 3Munson C L, Rosenblatt M J, Rosenblatt Z. The use and abuse of power in supply chains[ J]. Business Horizons, 1999, 42( 1 ) : 55--65.
  • 4Sadrian A A, Yoon Y S. Business volume discount: A new perspective on discount pricing strategy[J]. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1992, 28 (2) : 43--46.
  • 5Sadrian A A, Yoon Y S. A procurement decision support system in business volume discount environments[ J]. Operations Research, 1994, 42(1) : 14-23.
  • 6Lee H L, Padmanabhan P, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect[ J]. Management Science, 1997, 43(4) : 546--558.
  • 7Graves S C. A single-item inventory model for a nonstationary demand process[ J]. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 1999, 1 ( 1 ) : 50-61.
  • 8Kelle P, Milne A. The effect of (s, S) ordering policy on the supply ehainl J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 1999, 59(1-3): 113--122.
  • 9Chen F, Drezner Z, Ryan J K, et al. Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information [ J ]. Management Science, 2000, 46 (3) : 436--443.
  • 10Chen F, Ryan J K, Simchi-Levi D. The impact of exponential smoothing forecasts on bullwhip effect[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2000, 47 (4) : 269--286.

二级参考文献288

  • 1黄小原,郭海峰,卢震.供应链时滞系统模型及其牛鞭效应的H_∞控制[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(6):585-590. 被引量:27
  • 2Box,G.E.P G.M.Jenkins 等.时间序列分析:预测与控制[M].中国统计出版社,1997..
  • 3季建华(译).供应链设计与管理[M].上海:远东出版社,2000..
  • 4[1]Lee H L, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. The bullwhip effect in supply chain[J].Sloan Management Review, 1997,38(4):93-102
  • 5[2]Sterman J D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment[J]. Management Science,1998,35(3):321-339
  • 6[3]Towill D R. Industrial dynamics modeling of supply chains[J].International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,1996, 26(2): 23-42
  • 7[4]Lee H L, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect[J]. Management Science, 1997,43(4):546-558
  • 8[5]Frank C, Zvi D, Jennifer R K, el al. Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information[J]. Management Science, 2000,46(3):436-443
  • 9[6]Cachon G P, Martin L A. Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance[J].Management Science, 1999,45(8):1091-1108
  • 10[7]Rosenblatt M J. Improving profitability with quantity discounts under fixed demand[J].IIE Transactions, 1984,17(4):388-395

共引文献388

同被引文献10

  • 1hi lawadi K. L. The retai I power-performance conundrum. What have we learned lournal of Retailing, 2001, 77: 299-318.
  • 2Bradley l. Arntzen B. The simultaneous planning of production, capacity, and inventory in seasonal demand environments. Operations Research, 1999,47:795-806.
  • 3Chen F. Sales-force incentives and inventory and inventorymanagement. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2000, 2: 186-202.
  • 4Chert F. Drezner Z. Ryan J.K. Simchi-Levi D. Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Science, 2000,46:436-443.
  • 5Gaba A. Kalra A. Risk behavior in response to quotas and contests. Marketing Science, 1999,18:417-434.
  • 6Hammond &H. Barilla SpA(A).Harvard Business School Case, 1994:694-1046.
  • 7Milam G.A laboratory study of haggling with deadlines. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006,24:505-520.
  • 8Sandholm T. Vulkan N. Bargaining with deadlines. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1999:44-51.
  • 9Singer M. Oonoso P. Konstantinidis G. Who wants to break the hockey-stick sales pattern in the supply chain. Annals of Opera- tions Research, 2009,169:131-147.
  • 10Sterman I. Teaching takes off:Flight simulators for man- agement education. OR/MS Today, 1992,19:40-44.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部