期刊文献+

酒石酸布托啡诺(诺扬)与芬太尼用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛的比较 被引量:3

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON BUTORPHANOL AND FENTANYL IN TREATMENT OF POST-LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTOTOMY PAIN
暂未订购
导出
摘要 [目的]评价新型镇痛药诺扬用于腹腔镜下胆囊切除术后镇痛的临床疗效、安全性及不良反应。[方法]45例接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的患者随机分成3组,每组15例,诺扬组1mg静脉滴注,芬太尼组50μg静脉滴注,空白对照组。观察静脉给药前,给药后0,5,10,15,30min时镇痛,镇静评分,心率,收缩压,呼气末二氧化碳,呼吸频率。术后1,2,3,4h镇痛评分(VAS),使用杜冷丁人数及不良反应。[结果]使用诺扬或芬太尼后,患者的疼痛评分降低(P=0.001),镇静评分升高(P=0.006)呼气末二氧化碳升高(P=0.02)。诺扬组患者的镇静评分高于芬太尼组(P﹤0.05),恢复室内诺扬组需追加止痛药的患者人数低于芬太尼组(13%vs33%,P﹥0.05),术后使用杜冷丁的人数低于芬太尼组(0vs13%,P﹥0.05)两组患者术后的不良反应无统计学差异。空白对照组患者的杜冷丁使用量,不良反应发生率高于诺扬组和芬太尼组(P﹤0.05)。[结论]腹腔镜术后病人按常规临床剂量使用诺扬镇痛能有效缓减术后疼痛,不良反应发生率低,诺扬临床镇静效果强于芬太尼,镇痛维持时间较长。 [Objective] To evaluate the post-operative analgesic efficacy, seettrity and side-effects of butorphanol compared to fentanyl. [ Methods] 45 patients undergoing laparoseopic cholecystectomy were recruited and divided into 3 groups : butorphanol group (15 patients), fentanyl group (15 patients) and control group (15 patients) . The index: the scores of sedation and pain intensity, HR, SBP, ETCO2, FF, were observed at the time of 0 min. 5 min, 10min, 15 min and 30 min before and after the treatment. Post-operative pain intensity was assessed at the time of lh, 2h, 3h and 4h, by recording visual analogue score (VAS), the people who used meperidine and the adverse effects were recorded. [ Results] The scores of pain were lower and the scores of sedation were higher compared to premedical in butorphanol group and in fentanyl group (P 〈 0.05). The scores of sedation was higher in butorphanol group than in fentanyl group (P 〈 0.05). ETCO2 increased significantly in both butorphanol and fentanyl groups (P 〈 0.05)The demands of meperidine and the adverse effects showed no significant different in both butorphanol and fentanyl groups. (P 〉 0.05) but were greater in the control group when compared with both the butorphanol and fentanyl groups (P 〈 0.05 ). [Conclusion ] These doses of butorphanol eotdd effectively reduce pain intensity after laparoseopic eholeeystectomy, the adverse effects were low. When compared to fentanyl, the degree of sedation was higher and the time of relieve pain was longer.
出处 《现代预防医学》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第18期3658-3660,共3页 Modern Preventive Medicine
关键词 诺扬 芬太尼 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 镇痛 随机对照研究 Butorphanol, Fentanyl Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Analgesia Randomized control study
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Alexander JI. Pain after laparoscopy [J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997, 79: 369-378.
  • 2Carr DB, Goudas LC. Acute pain [J]. Lancet, 1999, 353 (9169) : 2051-2058.
  • 3Bisgaard T. Analgesic treatment after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a critical assessment of the evidence [J]. Anesthesiology, 2006, 104 (4): 835-846.
  • 4Sinha S, Munikrishnan V, Montgomery J, Mitchell SJ. The impact of patient-controlled analgesia on laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2007, 89 (4) : 374-378.
  • 5Vogelsang J, Hayes SR.Butorphanol tartrate (stadol) : a review [J]. J Post Anesth Nuts, 1991, 6 (2) : 129-135.
  • 6Angst MS, Clark JD. Opioid-indueed hyperalgesia: a qualitative systematic review[J]. Anesthesiology, 2006, 104 (3): 570-587.
  • 7Ackerman WE, Juneja MM.A comparison of the incidence of pruritus following epidural oppid administration in the parturient[J]. Can J Anaesth, 1989, 36: 388-391.
  • 8Atkinson BD, Truitt LJ, Raybum WF, et al. Double-blind comparison of intravenous butorphanol (Stadol) and fentanyl (Sublimaze) for analgesia during labor [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 171 (4) :993-998.

同被引文献38

  • 1沈国容,王东明,赵志斌,徐德明.布托啡诺与芬太尼应用于全麻诱导期间呼吸循环变化的临床对照研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2005,34(10):1241-1243. 被引量:18
  • 2何玉莲,黎尚荣,高婉菱,黑子清,苏晓璐.布托啡诺在全麻后气管拔管期的应用[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(6):818-820. 被引量:21
  • 3Dunteman E. Karanikolas M. Fdos KS Transnasal butorphanol for the treatment of opioidmduced pruritus un- responsive to antihistamines [ J ]. Journal of pain and symptom management, 1996 , 12 ( 4 ) :255-260.
  • 4Halter JB, Pflug AE, Poae D. Mechanisms of plasma cate- cholamine increases during surgical stress in man [ J ]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab , 1997 ,45:936.
  • 5Chandni Sinha, Manpreet Kaur, Ajeet Kumar. Comparative evaluation of midazolam and butorphanol as oral premedication in pediatric patients [ J J. Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. , 2012 ,28 ( 1 ) : 32-35.
  • 6Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Bell C, et al. Premeditation in the United States : A status report [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1997 , 84 (4) :27-32.
  • 7Bhakta P, Ghosh BR, Roy M, et al. Evaluation of Intranasal midazolam for preanasthetic sedation in Paediatric patients [ J]. Indian J Anaesth ,2007 ,51 ( 11 ) : 1-6.
  • 8Lnnqvist PA, Habre W. Midazolam as premedication: Is the emperor naked or just half- dressed? [ J ]. Pediatr Anesth ,2005 ,15(26) :3-5.
  • 9Bergendahl H, Lonnqvist PA, Eksborg S. Clonidine in paediatric anaesthesia: A review of the literature and comparison with benzodiazepines for premedication [ J ]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2006 ,50( 1 ) :35-43.
  • 10Schmidt AP, Valinetti EA, Banderira D, et al. Jr Effects of preanesthetic administration of midazolam, clonidine, or dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain and anxiety in children [ J ]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2007 , 17 ( 6 ) : 67-74.

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部