摘要
对于宪法解释的效力,我国的宪法和法律都没有做出明确规定。目前,我国宪法学上的主流学说认为,宪法解释应当具有与法律同等或者比法律更高的规范效力。然而,由于宪法解释只是一种规范填补行为,它并不可具有像宪法修改或者立法一样的规范形成性质,因此这种学说存在难以圆说的内在矛盾。宪法解释一般被附随于违宪审查之中,从而宪法解释的效力通常亦为宪法裁判的效力所涵盖,并表现为一种裁判理由的效力。在我国,宪法解释虽可独立于宪法监督,但是它只有与原宪法规范相结合方才具有意义与效力。宪法解释的效力应当是宪法规范效力的一种延伸,并不具有独立性,更不具有规范效力。
There is no specific provision about the validity of constitutional interpretation in China’s constitution and laws.The mainstream of China’s constitutional studies holds that constitutional interpretation should have equal normative validity to or higher normative validity than laws.This opinion,however,has internal contradiction that can’t be justified,because constitutional interpretation is merely an action to supplement norms and does not have the property of forming norms,as constitutional amendment or legislation.Constitutional interpretation is generally attached to constitutional review,so the validity of constitutional interpretation is generally covered by the validity of constitutional judgment and manifested as the validity of the reason of judgment.In China,constitutional interpretation can be independent in constitutional supervision,but only by combining with the source constitutional norm can constitutional interpretation be meaningful and valid.The validity of constitutional interpretation should be the extension of the validity of constitutional norm and has neither independence nor normative validity.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第9期37-42,共6页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词
宪法解释
修宪
立法
效力
Constitutional Interpretation,Constitutional Amendment,Legislation,Validity
