期刊文献+

微泡浓度对于超声辐照诱导生物效应的影响 被引量:3

The influence of microbubble's concentration on bioeffects induced by ultrasound - mediated microbubble destruction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨全氟显微泡浓度对于超声辐照诱导体外培养的正常肝细胞“声致孔隙”效应、凋亡和坏死的影响。方法应用超声辐照含不同量微泡的HL-7702细胞悬液。实验设空白对照组(无造影剂,无辐照)、超声辐照组(无造影剂,超声辐照)及不同微泡浓度组[微泡数/细胞数(B/C)值为1~200,辐照10min]。辐照后观察大分子荧光物质进入细胞情况以检测“声致孔隙”效应,检测细胞活力及凋亡。结果与空白对照组及超声辐照组比较,B/C为5200组荧光染色阳性率明显增加,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。与空白对照组及超声辐照组比较,分别为B/C50、100及200组的细胞死亡率明显增加,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);超声辐照组与空白对照组比较,各项结果差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论一定浓度下诊断超声辐照国产造影剂全氟显可诱导正常肝细胞发生“声致孔隙”效应及细胞死亡。应用于诊断目的时,B/C值尽可能在10以下;应用于基因转染时则选择B/C值50较为适宜,必要时可达100。 Objective To investigate the effect on bioeffects such as sonoporation and cell killing that induced by domestic ultrasound contrast agent (perfluoropropane- albumin microsphere) and diagnostic ultrasound by microbubble concentration. Methods Suspensions of hepatocyte with microbubbules in different concentrations were exposed to diagnostic ultrasound. The study included blank contrast group(no microbubble, no ultrasound), exposed group(no microbubble, exposed to ultrasound) and 6 microbubble groups in different concentration (with different microbubbule/cell ratios for 1,5,10,50,100 and 200, exposed to ultrasound for 10min). The uptake of fluorescein isothiocyanatedextran (FD500) by hepatocyte was observed and the percentages of sonoporation cells were counted,the cell viability was determined by trypan blue stain immediately after exposure,and apoptosis of cells were detected by flow cytometry,with double staining of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled Annexin V/propidium iodide(PI). Results Fluorescence stain results: compared with blank contrast group or exposed group,the sonoporatin of groups with microbubble/cell ratio of 5 to 200 increased significantly ( P 〈0.05). Cell killing effects:compared with the blank contrast group,only the cell death percentages of microbubble groups with microbubble/cell ratio of 50,100 and 200 increased significantly( P 〈0.05). Compared with the exposed group, only that of groups with microbubble/cell ratio of 100 and 200 increased significantly( P 〈0.05). There was no significant different between blank contrast group and exposed group for all these results. Conclusions Sonoporation and cell killing effect can be induced by diagnostic ultrasound in HL-7702 with domestic ultrasound contrast agent (perfluoropropane-albumin microsphere). For diagnosis, the ratio of microbubbule/cell should better be under 10. While for gene transfection,the ratio should better be 50 and could be 100 if it is necessary.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 2008年第8期720-723,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
关键词 超声检查 微气泡 肝细胞 相对生物学效应 Ultrasonography Microbubbles Hepatocytes Relative biological effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献39

  • 1[1]Pang R,Poon RT.Angiogenesis and antiangiogenic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer Lett 2006; 242:151-167
  • 2[2]Fernando NH,Hurwitz HI.Targeted therapy of colorectal cancer:clinical experience with bevacizumab.Oncologist 2004;9 Suppl 1:11-18
  • 3[3]Kabbinavar FF,Hambleton J,Mass RD,Hurwitz HI,Bergsland E,Sarkar S.Combined analysis of efficacy:the addition of bevacizumab to fluorouracil/leucovorin improves survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:3706-3712
  • 4[4]Johnson DH,Fehrenbacher L,Novotny WF,Herbst RS,Nemunaitis JJ,Jablons DM,Langer CJ,DeVore RF 3rd,Gaudreault J,Damico LA,Holmgren E,Kabbinavar F.Randomized phase Ⅱ trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:2184-2191
  • 5[5]Niidome T,Huang L.Gene therapy progress and prospects:nonviral vectors.Gene Ther 2002; 9:1647-1652
  • 6[6]Ferber D.Gene therapy.Safer and virus-free? Science 2001;294:1638-1642
  • 7[7]Kaneda Y,Tabata Y.Non-viral vectors for cancer therapy.Cancer Sci 2006; 97:348-354
  • 8[8]Miller MW,Miller DL,Brayman AA.A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective.Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22:1131-1154
  • 9[9]Lawrie A,Brisken AF,Francis SE,Tayler DI,Chamberlain J,Crossman DC,Cumberland DC,Newman CM.Ultrasound enhances reporter gene expression after transfection of vascular cells in vitro.Circulation 1999; 99:2617-2620
  • 10[10]Unger EC,Matsunaga TO,McCreery T,Schumann P,Sweitzer R,Quigley R.Therapeutic applications of microbubbles.Eur J Radiol 2002; 42:160-168

共引文献27

同被引文献26

  • 1邓洪新,田聆,魏于全.基因治疗的发展现状、问题和展望[J].生命科学,2005,17(3):196-199. 被引量:37
  • 2Katsuki H.Exploring neuroprotective drug therapies for intracerebral hemorrhage.J Pharmacol Sci,2010,114:366-378.
  • 3Nishimura K,Takahashi J.Therapeutic application of stem cell technology toward the treatment of Parkinson' s disease.Biol Pharm Bull,2013,36:171-175.
  • 4Xie F,Boska MD,Lof J,et al.Effects of transcranial ultrasound and intravenous microbubbles on blood brain barrier permeability in a large animal model.Ultrasound Med Biol,2008,34:2028-2034.
  • 5Choi JJ,Feshitan JA,Baseri B,et al.Microbubble-size dependence of focused ultrasound induced blood-brain barrier opening in mice in vivo.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng,2010,57:145-154.
  • 6Uyama O,Okamura N,Yanase M,et al.Quantitative evaluation of vascular permeability in the gerbil brain after transient ischemia using evans blue fluorescence.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,1988:282-284.
  • 7Kinoshita M,McDannold N,Jolesz FA,et al.Targeted delivery of antibodies through the blood-brain barrier by MRI-guided focused ultrasound.Biochem Biophys Res Commun,2006,340:1085-1090.
  • 8Huang Q,Deng J,Wang F,et al.Targeted gene delivery to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced bloodbrain barrier disruption.Exp Neurol,2012,233:350-356.
  • 9Howles GP,Bing KF,Qi Y,et al.Contrast-enhanced in vivo magnetic resonance microscopy of the mouse brain enabled by noninvasive opening of the blood-brain barrier with ultrasound.Magn Res Med,2010,64:995-1004.
  • 10Sheikov N,McDannold N,Vykhodtseva N,et al.Cellular mechanisms of the blood-brain barrier opening induced by ultrasound in presence of microbubbles.Ultrasound Med Biol,2004,30:979-989.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部