期刊文献+

冠心病心绞痛(气虚血瘀证)症状疗效评分量表的研究 被引量:31

Study of the symptoms scale for evaluating changes in patients with coronary angina pectoris and Qi-deficiency combined with stagnation of blood in traditional Chinese medicine
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:建立冠心病心绞痛(气虚血瘀证)症状疗效评分量表。方法:症状评分与其发生率(频率)、重要性(专家评定)及严重性(轻中重)有关,根据以上3种因素(因子)的症状评分数学模型,形成冠心病心绞痛(气虚血瘀证)中医症状的评分量表,通过信度、效度、反应度的评价,确认其可行性和合理性。结果:6个症状(胸痛、胸闷、心悸、气短、神疲乏力、唇色紫暗)作为疗效评分症状群,根据其发生率、重要性和严重性确定了各自权重因子和量表等级分值。信度结果可靠,一致性良好,反应灵敏。结论:冠心病心绞痛(气虚血瘀证)中医症状疗效评分量表,可为此类临床研究提供一个应用工具。 AIM: To develope a symptom scale for evaluating efficacy of coronary angina pectoris and Qideficiency combined with stagnation of blood. METHODS: The symptom score is always related with its incidence rate (frequency), its importance (evaluated by experts) and its serious degree (light, moderate and serious) in a measuring scale, and a mathematical model was used to calculate the weight factor and its score for each symptom in the scale. In an example of coronary angina pectoris and Qi-deficiency combined with stagnation of blood trial was analyzed based on the scale, and the scale was evaluated with the reliability, the validity, and the responsibility to change. RESULTS: Six symptoms ( chest pain, chest distress, palmus, short breath, debilitation, and cyanosis)were selected as indices, and their weight factors and grades were calculated in a score scale. Some evaluations demonstrated that the approach showed a better feasibility, uniformity, and responsibility to change. CONCLUSlON: This scale can be used to evaluating the efficacy of coronary angina pectoris and Qi-deficiency combined with stagnation of blood in traditional Chinese medicine.
出处 《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 CAS CSCD 2008年第7期786-791,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
基金 上海市教委重点学科项目(J50303) 上海市重点学科建设项目Y0302) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAI08B04-7) 上海市高校研究院项目(E0308)
关键词 冠心病 心绞痛 气虚血瘀证 量表 信度 效度 反应度 权重因子 coronary artery disease angina pecto-ris Qideficiency combined with stagnation of blood scale reliability validity responsibility to change weight factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1吕映华,许羚,杨娟,何迎春,刘红霞,孙瑞元,郑青山.症状疗效量表的数学模型研究[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2007,12(7):808-813. 被引量:2
  • 2Satty TL. The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc, 1980:17 - 34.
  • 3吕映华,郑青山.医学量表研究中的数学模型及其评价[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2007,12(6):690-696. 被引量:16
  • 4Asano M, Sugiura T, Miura K, et al. Reliability and validity of the self-report Quality of Life Questionnaire for Japanese School-aged Children with Asthma (JSCA-QOL v.3)[J]. Allergy Int, 2006,55(1):59-65.
  • 5Awata S, Bech P, Yoshida S, et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index in the context of detecting depression in diabetic patients[J]. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ,2007,61 (1) : 112 - 119.
  • 6Fraser A, Delaney BC, Ford AC, et al. The short-form leeds dyspepsia questionnaire validation study[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2007,25(4) .-477 - 486.
  • 7Gulec H, Sayar K. Reliability and validity of the Turkish form of the somatosensory amplification scale[J]. Psychiatry Clinic Neurosci, 2007,61(1) :25 - 30.

二级参考文献30

共引文献16

同被引文献477

引证文献31

二级引证文献296

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部