期刊文献+

大斜度井两种计算产能和表皮系数方法的对比与讨论 被引量:10

The Comparison and Discussion on Two Methods of Calculating Deliverability and Skin Coefficient in Slanted Well.
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于计算大斜度井产能的两种方法(Cinco-Lee法和Besson法),分别在各向同性和各向异性的地层中,针对影响产能的各个因素(井斜角、厚度、各向异性)及其相互关系进行了研究。结合现场实例,进行比较分析发现,井斜角大于75°时,Cinco-Lee法误差较大,此时在井斜小于90°时,适合用Besson法;在各向异性地层中,产量随井斜角增大而增大;随着地层非均质性的增强,产量小幅度递减。 To two ways of calculating slanted well productivity (Cinco-Lee and Besson), every factor (deviation angle, thickness, anisotropism) influencing on productivity and their relationship is studied in the isotropic and anisotropic formation. Examples associating with comparative analysis in oilfield show that it is fit for Besson's if deviation angle is more than 75°but Cinco-Lee method has more errors when it less than 90°, and production increases with slanted well increasing in anisotropic formation, and production reduces within a narrow range with heterogeneity of formation enhancing.
出处 《油气井测试》 2008年第4期21-23,共3页 Well Testing
关键词 大斜度井 产能 表皮系数 计算方法 slanted well, productivity, skin factor, calculation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1张继芬,王再山,高文君.(拟)稳定流斜直井产能预测方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1995,14(4):69-74. 被引量:21
  • 2Besson J. Performance of Slanted and Horizontal Wells on an Anisotropic Medium, Paper SPE 20965 (1990).
  • 3Cinco-Lee H et al. Pseudo-Skin Factors for Partially Penetrating Directionallv Drilled Wells. SPE 5589, 1975.
  • 4Babu D K, Odech A S. Productivity of a Horizontal Well, SPE 18298, 1989.

共引文献20

同被引文献109

引证文献10

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部