摘要
目的:对临床上常用的三种供皮区处理方法进行比较,探索最佳的供皮区保护方法,以指导临床应用。方法:对三种供皮区面积小于10cm×10cm的创面保护方法术后并发症及愈合效果进行统计学分析和比较性研究。结果:与对照组相比,自体中厚皮片拉拢回植法可有效促进供皮区创面愈合(P<0.05)。三种供皮区处理方法之间比较,差别具有显著性意义(P<0.05),自体中厚皮片拉拢回植法可有效促进供皮区创面愈合。结论:从经济与合理的角度考虑,对供皮区面积小于10cm×10cm的创面而言自体中厚皮片拉拢回植法应为临床首选。
Objective To compare the three commonly methods used clinical skin donor site wounds treatment, and to explore the best methods for protecting the skin donor site wounds, and to guide clinical application. Methods Statistical analysis and comparative studies was used in the postoperative complications and healing effects of three methods of protecting skin donor site wounds not less than lOcm x lOcm. Results Compared with the control group, the autogenic moderate thickness of free skin graft method can effectively promote the healing of the skin donor site wounds （P〈0.05）, there are significant difference between the three commonly methods used in clinical skin donor site wounds protection （P〈0.05）. Conclusion From the economical and rational point of view, the autogeneic moderate thickness of free skin graft method should be the first choice for clinical therapy in skin donor site wounds,not less than 10cm× 10cm.
出处
《中国美容医学》
CAS
2008年第8期1125-1127,共3页
Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词
供皮区
创面
愈合
skin donor site
wound
healing
