期刊文献+

Truview^(TM) EVO_2光学喉镜和Macintosh直接喉镜经口气管插管时血流动力学反应的比较 被引量:3

Hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation:a comparison between Truview^(TM) EVO_2 optic laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较TruviewTM EVO2光学喉镜和Macintosh直接喉镜经口气管插管时的血流动力学反应。方法:80例ASA分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级,年龄18~65岁,拟在经口气管插管全身麻醉下实施择期手术的患者,随机分为T组和M组2组,每组各40例患者。在静脉麻醉诱导后,T组和M组分别应用TruviewTM EVO2光学喉镜和Macintosh直接喉镜实施经口气管插管操作。记录麻醉诱导前(T0)、气管插管前(T1)、气管插管即刻(T2)、气管插管后1 min(T3)、3 min(T4)、5 min(T5)时的心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)及脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2),并记录喉部结构显露时间、插管完成时间。结果:两组患者除插管即刻(T2)的HR差异显著外(P<0.05),观察期内其他各对应时间点的血流动力学指标无显著性差异(P>0.05)。两组患者喉部结构显露时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);T组患者的气管插管完成时间较M组延长(P<0.05),但无超过60 s者。结论:TruviewTM EVO2光学喉镜和Macintosh直接喉镜经口气管插管可引起相似的血流动力学反应。 Objective: To compare the hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation between Truview^TM EVO2 optic laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope. Methods: Eighty adult patients (ASA physical status Ⅰ~Ⅱ,aged 18-65 years) scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracbeal intubation were randomly divided into 2 groups (n 40 each) :T group and M group. After standard intravenous anesthetic induction,orotracheal intubation was performed with Truview^TM EVO2 optic laryngoscope or Macintosh direct laryngoscope. Non-invasive heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP),diastolic blood pressure (DBP),mean arterial pressure (MAP) and SpO2 were recorded before(T0) and after anesthetic induction (T1),at intubation (T2),1 minutes (T3),3 minutes (T4) and 5 minute after intubation (T5). The laryngeal exposure period and intubation period were also recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 13. 0. Results: Except for HR at intubation (T2), there was no significant difference in the hemodynamic data at any other time points between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the laryngeal exposure period between the two groups. The intubation time in the T group was significantly longer than that in the M group (P〈 0.05) ,but no more than 60 seconds. Conclusion: The bemodynamic responses produced by orotracbeal intubation are similar between Truview^TM EVO2 optic laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope.
出处 《第二军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第8期954-957,共4页 Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
关键词 TRUVIEW^TM EVO2光学喉镜 MACINTOSH直接喉镜 经口气管插管 血流动力学 Truview^TM EVO2 optic laryngoscope macintosh direct laryngoscope orotracbeal intubation bemodynamic responses
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Li J B,Xiong Y C,Wang X L,Fan X H ,Li Y,Xu H,et al. An evaluation of the TruView EVO2 laryngoscope[J]. Anaesthesia, 2007,62:940-943.
  • 2Barak M, Philipchuck P, Abecassis P, Katz Y. A comparison of the Truview blade with the Macintosh blade in adult patients [J]. Anaest hesia, 2007,62 : 827-831.
  • 3Matsumolo S, Asai T, Shingu K. Truview video laryngoscope in palients wilh difficult airways[J]. Anesth Analg, 2006, 103: 492-493.
  • 4Lieberman N,Hakim A R,l.emberg L,Berkenstadt H. Trueview blade improves laryngeal view when compared to Macin losh blade[J]. Anesthesiology, 2003,99 : A565.
  • 5Imai M, Matsumura C, Hanaoka Y, Kemmotsu O. Comparison of cardiovascular responses to airway managements, fiberoptie intubation using a new adapter, laryngeal mask insertion, or conventional laryngoscopic intubation[J]. J Clin Anesth, 1995, 7:14-18.
  • 6Takahashi S, Mizutani T, Miyabe M,Toyooka H. Hemodynam ic responses to tracheal intuhation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device (Trachlight) in adults with normal airway[J]. Anesth Analg,2002,95:480-484.
  • 7Agro F, Barzoi G, Montecchia F. Tracheal intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope or a GlideScope in 15 patients with cervical spine immobilization[J]. Br J A naesth, 2003,90 : 705-706.
  • 8Doyle D J. Awake intubation using the GlideScope video laryngoscope:initial experience in four cases[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2004,51:520-521.
  • 9Shribman A J, Smith G, Achola K J. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intuhation[J]. Br J Anaesth,1987,59:295-299.
  • 10李平,何农,薛富善.气管插管的不良生理学影响及其防治[M].薛富善.现代呼吸道管理学-麻醉与危重症治疗关键技术.郑州:郑州大学出版社,2002.1020-1030.

同被引文献23

  • 1沈洪.扫描2005国际心肺复苏与心血管急救指南会议(1)——修改国际心肺复苏指南的原则与方法[J].中国危重病急救医学,2005,17(4):197-199. 被引量:52
  • 2李玄英,薛富善,张国华,孙海涛,刘鲲鹏,李成文,许亚超,刘毅.GlideScope视频喉镜和Macintosh直接喉镜经鼻气管插管对血液动力学的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(2):147-148. 被引量:20
  • 3郑颖,连文洁,汪春英,张爱萍,张马忠,黄贞玲,杭燕南.喉罩与气管插管用于全麻乳腺癌根治术的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(4):288-290. 被引量:119
  • 4Li JB, Xiong YC, Wang XL, et al. An evaluation of the TruView EVO2 laryngoscope [J]. Anaesthesia, 2007,62 (9) :940-943.
  • 5Singh R, Singh P, Vajifdar H. A comparison of Truview infant EVO2 laryngoscope with the Miller blade in neo- nates and infants[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2009,19 (4) : 338- 342.
  • 6Nasim S, Maharaj CH, Butt I, et al. Comparison of the Airtraq and Truview laryngoscopes to the Macintosh la- ryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins[J]. BMC Emerg Med,2009(9) :2.
  • 7Malik MA, O'Donoghue C, Carney J, et al. Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview EVO2 with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthe- tists : a manikin study [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2009, 102 ( 1 ) : 128-134.
  • 8Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, et al. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobi- lization[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2008,101(5) : 723-730.
  • 9Barak M,Philipchuck P, Abecassis P, et al. A comparison of the Truview blade with the Macintosh blade in adult patients[J]. Anaesthesia, 2007,62(8) : 827-831.
  • 10Carlino C, Pastore JC, Battistini GM, et al. Training resi dent anesthesiologists in adult challenging intubation comparing Truview EVO2 and Macintosh laryngoscope:a preIiminary study[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2009,75 ( 10 ) : 563-567.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部