期刊文献+

组配式假体在Paprosky Ⅲ型股骨近端骨缺损翻修中的应用 被引量:2

Application of modular femoral prosthesis in total hip revision surgery for Paprosky type Ⅲ bone defect of proximal femur
暂未订购
导出
摘要 [目的]报道应用组配式远端固定生物型假体翻修PaproskyⅢ型股骨近端骨缺损的手术要点及疗效:[方法]2003年5月-2006年10月应用MP、ZMR组配式股骨假体翻修PaproskyⅢ型股骨近端骨缺损9例,男5例,女4例.年龄39—65岁,平均57岁,术后随防时间8—34个月,平均19个月。翻修原因:7例为骨水泥固定假体松动、骨溶解,2例为珊瑚面假体无菌性松动:原手术到翻修时间最短4年,最长12年。依据Paprosky分型,ⅢA型5例,ⅢB型4例。[结果]Hanris评分:术前平均35分(28—54分),术后85分(70—90分)。7例弃拐行走,2例存在大腿疼痛.其中1例轻度疼痛伴下肢短缩2.5cm,需扶手杖行走,1例中度疼痛,扶单拐行走、跛行。本组随访过程中均无再松动、感染征象,1例发生假体下沉12mm,股骨柄远端无骨溶解现象。[结论]组配式远端固定生物型假体可较好完成PaproskyⅢ型股骨骨缺损的翻修,能达到初期及后期稳定。由于假体的假体柄与假体近端部分分开,使其植入变得容易,多部件组配可方便解决各种可能问题,如偏心距、前倾角、肢体长度等,明显简化了手术,且手术安全性好,是较理想的股骨翻修假体: [ Objective] To report the mid-term results and main points of modular femoral prosthesis in total hip revision surgery for Paprosky type Ⅲ bone defect of the proximal femur. [ Method] Nine eases of Paprosky type Ⅲ bone defect of the proximal femur were treated with modular femoral prosthesis MP and ZMR from May 2003 to October 2006. There were 5 males and 4 females with the age range of 39 -65 years (mean age 57 years). All the patients were followed up for 8 -34 months (mean 19 months ). Causes for revision included loosening and osteolysis of primary cemented prosthesis in 7 ,and coral face prosthesis sterile loosening in 2. The shortest time from the last operation to the revision was 4 years,and the longest was 12 years. There were 5 of type Ⅲ A and 4 of type Ⅲ B according to the Paprosky bone defect classification. [ Result] The Harris score was 35 points (28 - 54) before operation and 85 ( 70 - 90) 'after operation. Seven patients walked without the help of crutches,one had a mild pain in the thigh and a leg crispation of 2.5 centimeter, and the other having a medium pain in the thigh limping with a crutch. No significant loosening,infection or osteolysis of distal femur was found. One prosthesis sinking 12 mm in 1 case. [ Conclusion] Total hip revision surgel2y for Paprosky type Ill femoral bone defect using modular femoral prosthesis has optimal mid-term results. It offers stabilization both in the initial and late stages. Due to the separation of prosthetic stem front the proximal prosthesis,the implantation is easy to fix. Modular femoral prosthesis,which is benificial to control offset, anteversion angle,and limb length makes lhe total hip revision surgeD simpler and safer.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第16期1204-1206,共3页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 组配式股骨假体 股骨近端骨缺损 翻修术 modular femoral prosthesis bone defect of proximal femur revision
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Haydon CM. Mehin R, Bumett S.et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Resuhs at a mean of ten years[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) ,2004,6:1179 - 1185.
  • 2徐卫东,吴岳嵩.人工髋关节置换术后松动研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1999,6(6):460-461. 被引量:18
  • 3Crawford CH. Malkani AL. Incavo SJ,et al. Femoral component revision using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stern [ J ]. J Arthroplasty ,2004,1:8 - 13.
  • 4Reikeras O, Gunderson RB. Excellent results with femoral revision surgery using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem:59 patients followed for 10 -16 years[ J ]. Acta Orthop,2006.1:98 - 103.
  • 5Kwong LM, Miller A J, Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty : a 2 - 6 year follow-up study[J]. J Arthroplasty ,2003,18:94 -97.
  • 6Mumme T, Muller-Rath R, Andereya S,et al. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem [ J ]. Oper Orthop Traumatol,2007, 1:56 - 77.

共引文献17

同被引文献43

  • 1周宗科,裴福兴,程惊秋,廉永云.同种异体皮质骨板移植免疫学研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(3):201-203. 被引量:10
  • 2周勇刚,肖逸鹏,王岩,陈继营,郝立波,李静东,董纪元,林峰.二期翻修在人工髋关节置换术后感染治疗中的作用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(11):808-810. 被引量:30
  • 3Harkess JW.Arthroplasty of Hip: Revision of total hip arthroplasty.In Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics.Ninth edition, St.Louis, Mosby Inc., 1998.
  • 4Hunter GA, Welsh RP, Camerson HU, et al.The results of revision of total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg.1979, 61:419-423.
  • 5Amstutz HC, Ma SM, Jinnah RH, et al.Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2004; 420:2–9.
  • 6Katz RP, Callaghan JJ, Sullivan PM, et al.Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique.J Bone Joint Surg Br.1997;79:322-326.
  • 7Maurer SG, Baitner AC, Di Cesare PE.Reconstruction of the failed femoral component and proximal femoral bone loss in revision hip surgery.J Am Acad Orthop Surg.2000;8:354-363.
  • 8Labek G, Kovac S, Levasic V,et al.The outcome of the cementless tapered SL-Plus stem: an analysis of arthroplasty register data.Int Orthop.2012;36(6):1149-1154.
  • 9Zweymüller KA, Schwarzinger UM, Steindl MS.Radiolucent lines and osteolysis along tapered straight cementless titanium hip stems: a comparison of 6-year and 10-year follow-up results in 95 patients.Acta Orthop.2006; 77(6): 871-876.
  • 10Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC.Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components.Clin Orthop.1979;141:17-27.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部