期刊文献+

腹股沟疝传统修补和无张力修补疗效对比分析

Inguinal hernia tradition patching and unstressing patching curative effect contrastive analysis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹股沟疝传统修补和无张力修补手术的术后临床表现、并发症、复发对比。方法回顾分析88例传统疝修补术(Ⅰ组)与81例疝环填充式疝修补术(Ⅱ组)的病例资料。结果传统手术组术后局部疼痛、阴囊水肿术后1年复发情况均明显高于无张力修补组。结论疝环填充式疝修补术更符合人体解剖及生理特点,具有手术操作简单,术后恢复快、住院时间短、复发率低的优点。 Objective After discussion inguinal hernia tradition patching and unstressing patching surgery's technique, clinical manifestation, complication, recrudescence contrast. Methods The review analyzes 88 example tradition hernia plastic operation ( Ⅰ group) and 81 example hernia link packing type hernia plastic operation ( Ⅱ group) case material. Results After traditional surgery group technique, the local pain, the scrotum dropsy tech- nique latter 1 year recrudescence situation obviously is higher than the unstressing patching group. Conclusion The hernia link packing type hernia plastic operation conforms to the human anatomy and the physiological characteristic, has the surgery simplicity of operator. After the technique, restores quickly,in hospital time is short, recurrence rate low merit.
出处 《哈尔滨医药》 2008年第4期22-23,共2页 Harbin Medical Journal
关键词 腹股沟疝 补片 inguinal hernia mesh
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献1

  • 1吴阶平 裘法祖.黄家驷外科学,上册,第5版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1992.871.

共引文献654

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部