摘要
408UL、SystemFour这两种采集系统是目前比较常用的仪器,408UL主机以SOLARIS操作系统为软件平台,应用软件可实时监控排列,尤其在多台爆炸机生产、震源施工时,方便对采集质量进行控制,其主机硬件和野外地面设备轻便,不足之处是操作系统出现问题维护比较麻烦,缺少采集数据质量控制的软件;System Four则以Win-dows2000为软件平台,应用软件功能丰富,它自带质量控制软件Source Aware,能有效监视数据采集质量,缺点是仪器主机体积较大,操作系统容易受病毒感染。本文根据两种仪器在实际生产中的使用情况,从软硬件组成、技术性能、操作使用、常见故障、对特殊地形的适应程度等方面对两种系统进行了对比,并分析了它们的优点与不足。
Two acquisition systems, 408UL and System Four, are the most common used seismographs currently. The 408UL master processor takes the SOLARIS operation system as soft platform, in which the application software can carry out real-time controlling the spread, and is convenient to carry out controlling the acquisition quality espe- cially in using multiple blasters or sources for operation and production. The hardware of master processor and field surface equipments are portable. The disadvantages are difficult to maintenance when the operation system has problem and lack of software to implement quality control of acquisition data. The System Four takes Windows 2000 as software platform, which is abundant in software functions. It has own QC software SourceAware, which can effectively monitor the data acquisition quality. The disadvantages are large volume of master processor and operation system being easily infected by virus. According to the two seismographs＇ usage in practical production, the paper made correlation of two systems from composition of software and hardware, technical property, operation, common troubles and adaptativity to special topography and analyzed their advantages and disadvantages.
出处
《物探装备》
2008年第4期238-243,共6页
Equipment for Geophysical Prospecting
