摘要
鉴定结论必须经过质证后才能作为定案的依据。由于专家证人与鉴定人所处的诉讼阶段不同、作证方式不同、作证对象不同、作证的主体确定性不同、法律后果不同，鉴定人与专家证人所担负的权利义务不同，在开庭审理阶段鉴定人角色转换为专家证人。由于专家证人虽具有证人的一般特征，但专家证人由于其专业性又有别于证人具有特殊的效力。专家证人仅是鉴定结论的提供者，其出庭质证是为了证实证据的真实性、可靠性，专家证人本身不应成为证据种类，而应该建立诉讼法中的专家证人制度，保障专家证人的诉讼权利，以实现实体程序上的公正。
Appraisal conclusion must go through cross - examination before being able to be used as the basis for determining cases. As the expert witness and appraiser have many differences： different suit stages, different testimony means, different testimony object, different subject certainty of testimony, different legal consequences and different duty and rights, during the court suit session, the appraiser needs to be changed into expert witness. Though expert witness has the general characteristics, they can provide special force owing to the specialty. Expert witness is the provider of appraisal conclusion. His testimony on court is to confirm the truth and reliability of evidences. Witness expert should not become an evidence type. An expert witness system should be set up in procedural law to protect the procedural rights so as to realize fairness of the body procedure.
出处
《贵州工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2007年第6期118-120,共3页
Journal of Guizhou University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
鉴定结论
鉴定人
专家证人
证据种类
appraisal conclusion
appraiser
expert witness
evidence category
