期刊文献+

腹膜透析治疗尿毒症患者血液透析后大量腹水的疗效 被引量:1

Approach on the Effect of Peritoneal Dialysis in the Treatment of Patients with Mass Ascites after Hemodialysis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨腹膜透析(PD)在尿毒症患者血液透析(HD)后大量腹水中的应用价值。【方法】对25例HD后大量腹水的慢性肾衰患者,在给予内科综合治疗同时,先给予间歇性腹膜透析(IPD),1周后转为持续性不卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)。观察患者自觉症状及浮肿等体征的改善情况,测定透析方式改变前、治疗6个月后腹水生化,尿素氮(BUN)、血肌酐(Scr)、血红蛋白(Hb)、总蛋白(TP)、白蛋白(Alb)等指标的变化情况。【结果】患者经PD后自觉症状均明显好转,食欲改善,浮肿逐渐消退。患者透析后Scr、BUN明显下降,Hb、TP、Alb明显上升(P<0.01)。【结论】PD是治疗HD后大量腹水患者的一种有效手段,值得推广。 [Objective]To investigate the effect of peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of patients with mass ascites after hemodialysis. [Methods] Twenty five patients with mass ascites after hemodialysis received internal medicine therapy combined with intermittent peritoneal dialysis(IPD), and then continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis(CAPD) after a week. The subjective symptom and edema were observed, and biochemistry of ascites, blood urea nitrogen(BUN ), serum creatinine(Scr), hemoglobin(Hb), total protein(TP), albumin (Alb) before changing modes of dialysis and 6 months after treatment were determined. [Results] After peritoneal dialysis, the subjective symptoms of all patients got better obviously, the appetite improved, the edema disappeared gradually, and Scr and BUN decreased obviously( P 〈0.01), while Hb, TP, Alb increased significantly( P 〈0.01). [Conclusion] Peritoneal dialysis is and effective treatment for patients with mass ascites after hemodialysis, thus it's worthy of clinical generalization.
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2008年第7期1263-1264,1267,共3页 Journal of Clinical Research
关键词 尿毒症/治疗 腹水/治疗 腹膜透析 血液透析 uremia/TH ascites/TH peritoneal dialysis hemodialysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献13

  • 1钟伟强,杨永铭,刘冠贤,谭志明,杨铁城.尿毒症患者血透后出现大量腹水改腹透的探讨[J].中华肾脏病杂志,1997,13(1):62-62. 被引量:11
  • 2Carmichael P, Poola J, John I, et al. Assessment of quality life in a single centre dialysis population using the KDQOL-SFTM questionaire. Qual Life Res, 2000, 9: 195-205.
  • 3Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB, et al. Validating the SF-36health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. Br Med J, 1992, 305: 160-164.
  • 4Maor Y, King M, Olmerand L, et al. A comparison of three methods, the time trade-off technique, global healthy related quality of life and the SF-36 in dialysis patients. Clin Epidemiol,2001,54: 565-570.
  • 5Rao S, Carter WB, Mapes DL, et al. Development of subscales from the symptom/problem and effect of kidney disease scales of kidney disease quality of life instrument. Clin Ther, 2000, 22:1099-1111.
  • 6Maruschka P, Merkus M, Jager J, et al. Quality of life in patients on chronic dialysis: self-assessment 3 months after the start of treatment. Am J Kidney Dis, 1997, 29: 584-592.
  • 7Hyodo T, Yamamoto S, Inoguchi Y, et al. Individual application of the kidney disease quality of life instruments to monitor the healthy status of dialysis patients. Nephron, 2000, 86:391-392.
  • 8Hays RD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, et al. Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. Qual Life Res, 1994,3: 329-338.
  • 9Meys KB, Espindle DM, Degiacomo JM, et al. Monitoring dialysis patients, health status. Am J Kidney Dis, 1994,24: 267-279.
  • 10Mittal SK, Ahern L, Flaster E,et al. Self assessed quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Nephrol,2001,21:215-220.

共引文献244

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部