期刊文献+

600MW燃煤电站烟气汞形态转化影响因素分析 被引量:13

An Analysis of the Factors Exercising an Influence on the Morphological Transformation of Mercury in the Flue Gas of a 600 MW Coal-fired Power Plant
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 燃煤电站汞排放是自然界人为汞排放的最大污染源,所以进行燃煤电站不同形态汞排放浓度的现场测试对了解和控制汞排放的规律有重要意义。采用国际上通用的Ontario Hydro方法对某600MW燃煤电站ESP前、后的烟气进行采样,应用美国EPA标准方法测定了烟气中Hg0、Hg2+和HgP的浓度,应用DMA80测定固体样品(煤、底灰、ESP飞灰)中的汞浓度。测试结果表明:烟气经过ESP前后,烟气中汞形态发生了显著变化,Hg2+的比例由14.71%变为39.54%,Hg0由85.19%变为60.38%,HgP由0.10%变为0.08%。煤中的氯,烟气中的NOx、SO2、HCl和Cl2对烟气中氧化态汞的形成呈正相关。 Mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants are regarded as the largest pollution source of man-made mercury emissions in nature. Hence,to perform an on-the-spot testing of the mercury emission concentration in various forms from a coal-fired power plant is of vital significance for understanding and controlling the law and regularity of mercury emissions. With the internationally accepted Ontario Hydro method being adopted to sample the flue gas before and after an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) in a 600 MW coal-fired power plant,the American EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) standard method was used to determine Hg0,Hg2+and HgP concentration in the flue gas,and DMA 80 was employed to ascertain the mercury concentration in solid samples (coal,bottom ash,ESP fly ash). The testing results show that when the flue gas passes through the ESP,the morphology of the mercury contained in the flue gas will undergo a remarkable change. The percentage of Hg2+ will increase from 14.71% to 39.54%,that of Hg0 will decrease from 85.19% to 60.38% and that of HgP will drop from 0.10% to 0.08%. The chlorine in coal and NOx,SO2,HCl,Cl2 in the flue gas assume a positive correlation to the formation of oxidized mercury in the flue gas.
出处 《热能动力工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期399-403,共5页 Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)基金资助项目(2002CB211604 2006CB200300)
关键词 燃煤电站 汞形态分布 烟气 coal-fired power plant,mercury morphological distribution,flue gas
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1EPA. Environmental protection agency, office of air quality planning and standards and office of research and development [ R]. Mercury Study Report to Congress, EPA 452 r R - 97 - 003, Washington: Government Printing Office, 1997.
  • 2GALBREATH KEVIN C, CHRISTOPHER ZYGARLICKE. Mercury transformations in coal combustion flue gas[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000,65/66: 289 - 310.
  • 3HELBLE JOSEPH J. Trace element partitioning during coal gasification [J]. Fuel, 1996,75(8) :931 - 939.
  • 4HALL B, SCHAGER P, LINDQVIST O. Chemical reactions of mercury in combustion flue gases[J]. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 1991,56:3 - 14.
  • 5任建莉,周劲松,骆仲泱,岑可法.燃煤过程中汞的析出规律试验研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2002,36(4):397-403. 被引量:28
  • 6LIU KUNLEI, GAO YING, RILEY JOHN T, et al. An investigation of mercury emission from FBC systems fired with high-chlorine coals[J]. Energy & Fuels,2001,15: 1173 - 1180.
  • 7SENIOR CONSTANCE L, SAROFIM ADEL F, ZENG TAO FANG, et al. Gas-phase transformations of mercury in coal-fired power plants [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000,63:197 - 213.
  • 8高洪亮,周劲松,骆仲泱,午旭杰,倪明江,岑可法.氯化氢对燃煤烟气中汞形态分布影响的实验研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2004,38(6):765-769. 被引量:17
  • 9SHAWN KELLIE, YAN CAO, YUFENG DUAN, et al. Factors affecting mercury speciation in a 100 MW coal-fired boiler with low-NOx bumers[J] .Energy & Fuels,2005,19:800 - 806.
  • 10SANDHYA ESWARAN, STENGER HARVEY G. Understanding mercury conversion in selective catalytic reduction ( SCR ) catalysts [ J ]. Energy & Fuels,2005,19:2328 - 2334.

二级参考文献20

  • 1THOMAS D, DENNIS N, RICHARD A, et al. Mercury measurement and its control: what we know, have learned, and need to further investigate [J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1999,6:23-30
  • 2EPA.U.S. Research and development, control of mercury emissions from coal-fired electricity boilers: interim report including errata dated 3-21-02, EPA-600/R-01-109 [R]. Washington, DC, US: Government Printing Office, 2002:3-6.
  • 3EPA.U.S. Standard test method for mercury from coal-fired stationary sources (Ontario Hydro Method) [R]. Washington, DC,US: Government Printing Office, 1999:1-20.
  • 4SLIGER R, KRAMLICH J. Towards the development of a chemical kinetic model for the homogeneous oxidation of mercury by chlorine species [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, 65: 423-424.
  • 5HALL B, LINDQVIST O, LJUNGSTROM E. Mercury chemistry in simulated flue gases related to waste incineration conditions [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1990,24(1): 108-120.
  • 6HALL B, SCHAGER P, LJUNGSTROM E. Chemical reactions of mercury in combustion flue gases [J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1991, 56: 3-14.
  • 7LANCIA A, MUSMARRA D, PEPE F, et al. Adsorption of mercuric Chloride Vapor from incinerator flue gases on calcium hydroxide particles [J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1993, 93:277-289.
  • 8Thomas D, Dennis N, Richard A, et al. Mercury Measurement and Its Control: What We Know, Have Learned, and Need to Further Investigate[J]. Journal of the air & waste management association, 1999,49(6) :23--30.
  • 9U. S. EPA. Research and Development, Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-fired Electricity Boilers: Interim Report IncludingErrata Dated 3-21-02, EPA-600/R-01-109[R].U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington D C, April 2002.5,3--6.
  • 10U. S. EPA, Standard test method for mercury from coal-fired stationary sources (Ontario Hydro Method) [ R ].U. S. Government Printing Office: Washington D C, July 7, 1999:1--20.

共引文献57

同被引文献156

引证文献13

二级引证文献100

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部