期刊文献+

Selling creates a loss while buying generates a gain: Capturing the implicit irrational bias by the IAT method

Selling creates a loss while buying generates a gain: Capturing the implicit irrational bias by the IAT method
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 The endowment effect is the tendency for a person to demand more in return for selling an object than he or she would be willing to pay for the same product. Thaler suggested that the reason of endowment effect lies in that selling creates a loss while buying generates a gain. Although prior research has demonstrated the existence of loss aversion, few researchers have focused on the connection between "selling vs. buying" and "losing vs. gaining", and a recent research with a self-report method failed to find solid evidence for such a connection. The present research applied the implicit association test, a latency method, to confirm this connection. The results demonstrated that selling was more closely connected to losing while buying was more closely connected to gaining. Thus the bias resulting from loss aversion and gain preference was confirmed to be the underlying mechanism of the endowment effect. The previous failure to find such an association may be due to the insensitivity of the self-report method. Here the implication of the findings and method for experimental economic psychology is discussed. The endowment effect is the tendency for a person to demand more in return for selling an object than he or she would be willing to pay for the same product. Thaler suggested that the reason of endowment effect lies in that selling creates a loss while buying generates a gain. Although prior research has demonstrated the existence of loss aversion, few researchers have focused on the connection between "selling vs. buying" and "losing vs. gaining", and a recent research with a self-report method failed to find solid evidence for such a connection. The present research applied the implicit association test, a latency method, to confirm this connection. The results demonstrated that selling was more closely connected to losing while buying was more closely connected to gaining. Thus the bias resulting from loss aversion and gain preference was confirmed to be the underlying mechanism of the endowment effect. The previous failure to find such an association may be due to the insensitivity of the self-report method, Here the implication of the findings and method for experimental economic psychology is discussed.
出处 《Chinese Science Bulletin》 SCIE EI CAS 2008年第14期2253-2256,共4页
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 70432002)
关键词 自然反应 心理暗示 心理测试 心理学 endowment effect, loss aversion, implicit association test, experimental economic psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kahneman D,,Knetsch J L,Thaler R H.Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem[].Journal of Political Economy.1990
  • 2Hoorens V,Remmers N,van de Riet K.Time is an amazingly variable amount of money: Endowment and ownership effects in the subjective value of working time[].J Econ Psychol.1999
  • 3De Dreu C K W,van Knippenberg D.The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: Effects of mere ownership, process account- ability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and be- havior[].J Personal Soc Psychol.2005
  • 4Kahneman D,Tversky A.Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[].Econometrica.1979
  • 5Watson J R,Winkelman J H.Short communication: "perceived own- ership" or cognitive dissonance?[].Eur J Soc Psychol.2005
  • 6Brown T C.Loss aversion without the endowment effect, and other explanations for the WTA-WTP disparity[].J Econ Behav Organ.2005
  • 7Brunel F F,Tietje B C,Greenwald A G.Is the implicit association test a valid and valuable measure of implicit consumer social cognition?[].J Consumer Psychol.2004
  • 8Greenwald A G,McGhee D,Schwartz J L K.Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test[].J Per-sonal Soc Psychol.1998
  • 9Nosek B A,Greenwald A G,Banaji M R.The implicit association test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review[].Automatic Processes in Social Thinking and Behavior.2007
  • 10Olson M A,Fazio R H.Relations between implicit measures of prejudice: What are we measuring?[].Psychological Science.2003

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部