期刊文献+

妇科腹腔镜手术135例临床分析 被引量:2

A clinical analysis of 135 cases of gynecological laparoscopic operation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜手术与开腹手术在治疗输卵管妊娠、卵巢良性肿瘤、子宫良性疾病中的效果和价值。方法腹腔镜下行输卵管切除、卵巢良性肿瘤剥除(切除)、辅助下阴式子宫切除手术患者135例为腹腔镜手术组;随机选择同期开腹行输卵管切除、卵巢良性肿瘤剥除(切除)、子宫切除患者135例为开腹手术组,对两组手术时间、术中出血、术后抗炎时间、补液时间、肠道恢复时间、住院时间及术后发热率进行比较。结果腹腔镜手术组与开腹手术组相比较,手术时间稍长,t=2.26,P>0.05,差异无显著性;术中出血少(t=3.97)、术后抗炎时间短(t=3.86)、补液时间短(t=3.72)、肠道恢复快(t=2.98)、住院时间短(t=3.63)、术后发热率低(t=4.18),均P<0.01,有显著性差异。结论腹腔镜手术创伤小,出血少,恢复快,术后并发症少,值得推广应用。 Objective To compare therapeutic effects and values of video-laparoscopic operation and laparotomy for treatment of tubal pregnancy, benign ovarian tumors or benign uterine diseases. Methods 270 women who expected to undergo tubal resection, resection or exploitation of ovarian benign tumor, assissted transvaginal hysterectomy were treated with laparoscopic operation or laparotomy at random (135 cases'treated with laparoscopic operation and other 135 cases treated with laparotomy operation). The operation time, intraoperative bleeding amount, postoperative anti-inflammatory therapy time, fluid replacement time, intestinal recovery coincidence time, length of stay and postoperative fever incidence in the two groups were compared. Results The operation time was slightly longer in the laparoscope group than laparotomy group but there was no significant difference between the two groups (t= 2.26, P 〉 0.05 ). Whereas intraoperative bleeding amount( t = 3.97 ), postoperative anti-inflammatory therapy time ( t = 3.86 ), fluid replacement time ( t = 3.72 ), postoperative intestinal function recovery coincidence time ( t = 2.98 ), length of stay ( t = 3.63 ), and postoperative fever incidence ( t = 4.18 ) in the laparoscoPe group were all significantly better than those in the laparotomy group and the differences were significant ( all P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Laparoscopic operation has some superiorities such as less invasiveness, less bleeding amount, quick postoperative recovery, few postoperative complications. So, it is worthy to be popularized in clinic.
出处 《中国妇幼健康研究》 2008年第3期247-248,共2页 Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词 妇科 腹腔镜 开腹 手术 department of gynecology laparoscopy laparotomy operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献22

  • 1魏丽惠,张安聚,吴燕.腹腔镜联合阴式全子宫切除45例[J].北京医科大学学报,1997,29(2):162-163. 被引量:8
  • 2Malik E, Schmidt M, Scheidel P. Complications after 106 laparoscopic hysterectomies. Zentralbl Gynakol, 1997,119:611-615.
  • 3Alvarez-Rodas E, Mettler L, Castro E, et al. Histologic features of the CISH procedure. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc,1994,2:37-41.
  • 4Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Ceanal H. Laparoscopic injuries and complication sovera 10-year period. Surg Endo, 1994, 8: 533-540.
  • 5Cardosi RJ, Hoffman MS. Determining the best route for hysterectomy. OBG Management, 2002,14:521-530.
  • 6Harmanli OH, Khilnani R, Dandolu V, et al. Narrow pubic arch and increased risk of failure for vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol, 2004,104:697-700.
  • 7Ferrari MM, Berlanda N, Mezzopane R, et al. Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomised comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. BJOG,2000,107:620-625.
  • 8Marvin H,Terry G. Complex hysterectomy: opting for the vaginal approach. OBG Management, 2002,14:354-358.
  • 9Hwang JL, Seow KM, Tsai YL, et al. Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6 cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g: a prospective randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2002,81:1132-1138.
  • 10Poindexter YM, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Poindexter AN 3rd, et al. Previous cesarean section. A contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy? J Reprod Med, 2001,46:840-844.

共引文献134

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部