中国全要素生产率分析:Malmquist指数法评述与应用被引量：334

The Analysis of Total Factor Productivity in China:A Review and Application of Malmquist Index Approach

导出

摘要本文首先对Malmquist指数法进行了回顾，对Malmquist指数各种分解的分歧和争论作了一个比较全面深入的介绍，并指出国内已有研究在指数分解方面存在的不足。在此基础上，对我国1979～2005年全要素生产率变动及其分解进行了分析。本文的主要结论是：改革开放以来，由于技术效率和生产技术的进步，我国全要素生产率得到了较大进步。但是1997年以后，由于技术效率下降，全要素生产率增长出现下降趋势。总体而言，由于地区之间技术差距的拉大，我国并没有出现全要素生产率的趋同效应。 This paper reviews the Malmquist Index Approach and introduces comprehensively the argument between the different decompositions of the Malmquist Index. It also points out the insufficiency in the past domestic researches about the decomposition. Based on it, the paper analyses the change and decomposition of the total factor productivity （TFP） in China during the period of 1979-2005. The major conclusions are as follows. The TFP has obtained considerable growth since the reform and open policy because of the progress of technical efficiency and technology. But the TFP has slowed down successively since 1997 as a result of the decrease of technical efficiency. As a whole the China＇ s economy has not shown the convergence effect because the disparity of technical progress.

作者章祥荪贵斌威

机构地区中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院中国人民大学经济学院

出处《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期111-122,共12页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics

关键词 MALMQUIST指数法全要素生产率技术效率技术进步趋同效应 Malmquist Index Approach Total Factor Productivity Technical Efficeency Technical Progress Convergence Effect

分类号 F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1Banker, R. D. , Chames, A. , and Cooper, W. W. , 1984, SomeModels for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis [J], Management Science 30, 1078-1092.
2Caves, D. W. , Christensen, L. R. , and W. E. Diewert, 1982, The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity [J], Econometrica 50, 1393-1414.
3Charnes, A. , Cooper, W. W. , and Rhodes, E. , 1978, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J], European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.
4Chow, Gregory, and Lin, Anloh, 2002, Accounting for Economic Growth in Taiwan and China's Mainland : A Comparative Analysis [J], Journal of Comparative Economics, 30, 507-530.
5Coelli, T. , Rao, P. , and Battese, G. E. , 1998, An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis [M], Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6Fare, R. , Grosskopf, S. , Lindgren B. , and Roos P. , 1994a [-1989], Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach [C], in A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin and L. M. Seiford, eds. , Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers . [Originally presented at a Conference on New Uses of DEA in Management and Public Policy, University of Texas, Austin, TX, September 27-29.]
7Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., and Zhang, Z., 1994b, Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries [ J ] , American Economic Review, 84, 66- 83.
8Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., and Norris, M., 1997, Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries: Reply [J], American Economic Review, 87, 1040-1043.
9Fare, R. , Grosskopf, S. , and Russell, R. R. , 1998, Index Numbers: Essays in Honor of Sten Malrnquist [M], Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10Farrell, M. J. , 1957, The Measurement of Production Efficiency [J], Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253-281.