摘要
"陶伯特说"认为马克思的《穆勒摘要》写于《44年手稿》笔记本Ⅲ之后,而"罗扬说"认为《穆勒摘要》写于《44年手稿》笔记本Ⅲ之前。本文对"陶伯特说"与"罗扬说"的论证过程进行了详细考察。结论是:"陶伯特说"既已成为MEGA2编委会所接受的文献学结论,理应成为中国学者进行马克思巴黎时期文本解读研究的文献学依据。
According to Taubert＇s argument, Marx＇s Comments on James Mill was written after the third manuscript of Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 while according to Rojahn＇s it was written before the third manuscript. This paper aims at an investigation into the very processes in which Taubert and Rojahn conducted their researches respectively with the conclusion that Chinese scholars should base their textual studies of Marx＇s early Manuscripts during his Paris period on Taubert＇s argument, given that it has been accepted by the Editorial Board of MEGA2.
出处
《现代哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第3期1-11,共11页
Modern Philosophy
