摘要
审视中国哲学的研究现实,一个不可否认的事实是,在追求西方的话语系统方面注入了过多的精力,而缺乏体现自己特色的应有坚持。其客观的结果不仅使我们至今都在怀疑自己有无哲学,而且使诸多古代哲学资源失去了为现代化服务的可能,诸如对"因循"思想的忽视就是一个事实。因循是道家实践哲学里的一个重要概念,有着丰富的资源,作为概念,它在历史上首次出现是在《慎子.因循》里,但其源头却在老子"辅万物之自然而不敢为"那里。"辅"的行为不仅标明了行为对象为"万物之自然",而且昭示了选择"辅"这一行为的理由为"不敢为",而"不敢为"又为"为者败之,执者失之"、"无为而无不为"的理论运思所支持,而"无不为"又为万物所具备的内在自能机能所保证。故确立老子"辅"的行为在因循哲学上的应有地位,不仅是中国哲学研究所必须,而且也是因循哲学研究的前提条件,这是还老子哲学、因循哲学研究以时代当为的必须。
An examination of the research on Chinese philosophy reveals the fact that it focuses too much on the Western discourse and ignores the adhrerence to its own traits.As a result,we still doubt whether we have had any phiolosophy and have failed to make ancient Chinese philosophy serve China's modernization.The ignorance of the idea of the philosophy of following Nature is a case in point.Following Nature is an important concept in Taoism and has its source in Master Lao Zi's philosophy.'Assistance' is the key part of this philosophy which reveals the internal mechanism of all things in Nature.Thus,Master Lao Zi's idea of 'assistance' has its indisputable position in the philosophy of following Nature and should be the focus of the research of Chinese philosophy and the precondition of the study of the philosophy of following Nature if rich fruits are expected to be obtained in this field.
出处
《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2008年第3期35-43,共9页
The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
