期刊文献+

交互时态信念逻辑及其模型检测 被引量:3

Alternating-time temporal belief logic and its model checking
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 交互时态认知逻辑(ATEL)是对交互时态逻辑(ATL)的扩展,但是它只刻画了知识,没有探讨信念的刻画问题.给出广义并发博弈结构,以模态算子的形式在ATL的语法层面给出了三种信念算子,在广义并发博弈结构下给出其语义,建立了交互时态信念逻辑(ATBL).给出一个多项式时间模型检测算法,并证明了ATBL的模型检测复杂度为PTIME-complete;给出并证明了ATBL的若干良好性质,比较了相关工作.对Agent认知形式化作了进一步探索,为多Agent系统研究提供了一个较好的形式化工具. In recent years, great interest is shown in the developing of multi-agent cooperation logics for the representation, reasoning and verification of multi-agent systems. The two foundamental multi-agent cooperation logics are called ATL (Alternating-time Temporal Logic) and CL (coalition game logic). Further work of muhb agent cooperation logics is done by investigating their complexity of satisfiability and model checking, as well as succinctness and expressivity. Furthermore, although much research work is left to be done, the combination of mult-agent cooperation logics with epistemic logic, BDI logic, normative systems and game theory turns out to be possible as a result. On extending ATL, ATEL (Alternating time Temporal Epistemic Logic) was developed. In ATEL, knowledge operators were added and its model checking complexity was investigated. However, belief operators were not taken into account. In this paper, first of all, the generalized concurrent game structures are introduced. Secondly, by introducing three kinds of belief operators into ATL and describing their semantics based on generalized concurrent game structures, a new logic which is called ATBL (Alternating-time Temporal Belief Logic) is developed. Last but not the least, a model checking algorithm whose time complexity is polynomial is developed, and it is proved that the model checking complexity of ATBL is PTIME complete. So that ATBL who is the counterpart of ATEL is developed for the research of multi agent systems, and the epistemic formalization of agents is further explored. Further work can be carried out on developing a sound and complete axiom system for ATBL, and the succinctness of this newly developed multi-agent cooperation logic can be investigated in depth and improved hopefully.
出处 《南京大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期171-178,共8页 Journal of Nanjing University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金(60373079,60573076) 中国科学院计算机科学重点实验室开放课题基金(SYSKF0505) 福建省自然科学基金(2006J0299)
关键词 交互时态逻辑 并发博弈结构 模型检测 知识 信念 alternating-time temporal logic, concurrent game structures, model checking, knowledge, belief
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Alur R, Henzinger T A, Kupferman O. Alternating-time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM, 2002, 49(5): 672-713.
  • 2Pauly M. Logic for ,social software Ph. D. Thesis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 2001.
  • 3agotnes T, van der Hoek W, Rodriguez-Aguilar J A, etal. On the logic of normative systems. Velo so M M. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2007), 2007, 1175-1180.
  • 4Agotnes T, van der Hoek W, Wooldridge M. Quantified coalition logic. Veloso M M. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2007), 2007, 1181-1186.
  • 5Walther D. Strategic logics: Complexity, completeness and expressivity. Ph.D. Thesis. Liverpool: University of Liverpool, 2007.
  • 6Goranko V, van Drimmelen G. Complete axiomatization and decidability of alternating time temporal logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 2006, 353(1-3): 93-117.
  • 7Goranko V, Jamroga W, van Drimmelen G. Axiomatic systems for alternating-time temporal epistemic logics. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory(LOFT'04), 2004, 1-4.
  • 8van der Hoek W, Wooldridge M. Cooperation, knowledge, and time: Alternating-time temporal epistemic logic and its applications. Studia Logica, 2003, 75(1): 125-157.
  • 9van der Hoek W, Wooldridge M. Tractable multiagent planning for epistemic goals. Castel franchi C, Johnson W. Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS-2002), 2002, 1167-1174.
  • 10Wooldridge M, Agotnes T, Dunne P E, et al. Logic for automated mechanism design-a progress report. Twenty-Second Conference on Artificial Intelligence ( AAAI - 2007), Canada: Vancouver, 2007,1-7.

二级参考文献28

  • 1莫绍揆 等.数理逻辑[M].高等教育出版社,1985..
  • 2李未,中国科学.A,1992年,22卷,10期,1103页
  • 3李季(译),心的分析,1958年
  • 4Kant I,纯粹理性批判,1957年
  • 5Rao A S,Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligenc,1991年,498页
  • 6Evans M,Andermn J,Crysdale G.Achieving flexible autonomy in multiagent systems using constraints.Applied Artificial intelligent,1992,6(1):103-126.
  • 7Wooldridge M J,Jennings N R.Intelligent agent:Theory and practice.Knowledge Engineering Review,1995,10(2):115~152.
  • 8Luck M,d’Inverno M.A formal framework for agency and autonomy.Lesser V.Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi—Agent Systems.Stanford,CA:AAAI Press,1995:254-268.
  • 9Reiter R.Knowledgc in action:Logical foundations for describing and implementing dynamical systems.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press,2001,35-105.
  • 10Castelfranchi C.Guarantees for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture.Wooldridge M J,Jennings N R.Intelligent Agents—Theories,Architecture,and Languages.Amsterdam:Springer—Verlag,1995:56-70.

共引文献42

同被引文献9

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部