摘要
目的探讨对急性心肌梗死患者实施健康教育的最佳方式和效果。方法将诊断明确的60例急性心肌梗死患者随机分为实验组30例,对照组30例。实验组给予临床护理路径进行健康教育;对照组采用一般健康教育方式。患者住院3天后接受问卷调查,比较两组患者对疾病知识、用药知识、自我防护能力的掌握和护理满意度情况。结果实验组患者对疾病知识、用药知识、自我防护能力的掌握和护理满意度均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论对急性心肌梗死患者实施临床护理路径的健康教育效果明显优于一般健康教育方式。
Object i ve To compare the effects of health education based on clinical pathway of nursing （ CPN ） and the conventional health education for the patients with acute myocardial infarction （AMI）. Methods A total of 60 AMI patients were randomly divided into 2 equal groups： test group receiving health education based on the specific needs of patients with the clinical pathway of nursing （ CPN ） after admission, and control group, receiving conventional health education. Three days after hospitalization a questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate the knowledge of AMI, medication, dietary therapy, and self-protection, and satisfaction to nursing. Results The scores of knowledge of AMI, medication, dietary therapy, and mastering of self-protection, and the satisfaction index to nursing of the test group were all significantly higher than those of the control group （all P〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion The method of clinical pathway of nursing in health education is superior to the conventional method of health education.
出处
《中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志》
2008年第5期285-286,共2页
China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine
关键词
急性心肌梗死
健康教育
临床护理路径
Acute myocardial infarction （AMI）
Health education
Clinical pathway of nursing
