期刊文献+

应用RT-PCR方法检测牛消化道各段Ⅰ型肽载体mRNA差异表达的研究 被引量:2

A Study on The Relative Expression of Peptide Transporter Ⅰ mRNA in Different Parts of Bovine Gastrointestinal Tract by RT-PCR
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 已有的研究表明,消化道可以小肽的形式吸收氨基酸,但尚未很好地确定小肽的主要吸收部位。我们在另一项研究中对牛Ⅰ型肽载体(BPepTⅠ)第3~10结构域1566bp片段序列进行了测定(Genebank登录号:DQ309694),与绵羊相同区域片段序列同源性高达96.04%。本研究以BPepⅠ测序结果为基础,并参考绵羊的部分序列设计了跨内含子引物,荧光实时定量聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)方法测定了牛离体各段消化道黏膜或上皮组织BPepTⅠ的相对表达水平,以评估小肽在牛消化道的主要吸收部位。以持家基因β-actin为参比基因,结肠样品为校正样品(其相对表达量2^-△△CT值为1),研究结果表明:在整段消化道中,BPepTⅠ的相对表达量(2^-△△CT值)由高到低依次为回肠(30.62)、空肠(26.12)、瓣胃(22.61)、瘤胃(16.17)、十二指肠(11.97)、网胃(5.18)、皱胃(3.22)、盲肠(1.13)和结肠(1.00)。各段消化道BPepTⅠ相对表达量差异显著(P〈0.05),其中回肠相对表达量与空肠和瓣胃差异不显著(P〉0.05),与瘤胃、十二指肠、网胃、皱胃、盲肠、结肠差异显著(P〈0.05);空肠相对表达量与瓣胃、瘤胃、十二指肠差异不显著(P〉0.05),与网胃、皱胃、盲肠、结肠差异显著(P〈0.05);网胃、皱胃、盲肠、结肠的2^-△△CT值均在5.2以下,相互之间相对表达量的差异不显著(P〉0.05)。由BPepTⅠ基因相对表达活性可以将牛的各段消化道分为3组,回肠、空肠、瓣胃的活性最高,其次为瘤胃和十二指肠,网胃、皱胃、盲肠、结肠则;。 It was well documented that part of the amino acids in the digesta could be absorbed in the form of small peptide, but which part (parts) of the GI tract absorb small peptide most activelly still need to be revealed. We have sequenced a 1 566 bp segment from the 3^rd to the 10^th domains of bovine peptide transporter Ⅰ (BPepT Ⅰ )in a previous study (Genebank accession No.: DQ309694), which has 96.04% similarity with the corresponding segment of sheep by homology analysis. A cross intron primer was designed based on the sequenced segment of BPepT Ⅰ and the sequence of sheep peptide transporter Ⅰ in the present study. The relative expression level of BPepT Ⅰ in the mucosa or epithelium of different parts of the GI tract of cattle was measured in vitro by RT-PCR techniques. Using housekeeping gene β-actin as the internal control and colon mucosa as the calibrator sample [the relative amount of gene expression (2^-△△CT value) was set to 1], the results revealed that the relative expression levels (2^-△△CT value) of BPepT Ⅰ differed (P〈0.05) in mucosa from different parts of the GI tract of cattle. The 2^-△△CT values from the highest to the lowest was the lieac mucosa (30.62), jejunal mucosa (26.12), omasal epithelium (22.61), ruminal epithelium (16.17), duodenal mucosa (11.97), reticular epithelium (5.18), abomasal mucosa (3.22), cecal mucosa (1.13), and colonic mucosa (1.00). Results of Duncan's multiple range test indicated that the 2^-△△CT value of ileum mucosa differed insignificantly with those of jejunal mucosa and omasal epithelium (P〉0.05), but differed significantly with the other 2^-△△CT values (P〈0.05); the 2^-△△CT value of jejunum mucosa differed insignificantly with those of omasal epithelium, rumen epithelium, and duodenum mucosa (P〉0.05), but differed significantly with those of reticular epithelium, abomasal mucosa, and colonic mucosa (P〈0.05). The 2^-△△CT values of reticular epithelium, abomasal mucosa, cecal mucosa, and colonic mucosa were below 5.2, and the difference among them was insignificant (P〉 0. 05). We proposed that the relative expression levels of different parts of the GI tract of cattle could be grouped into three categories based on their 2^-△△CT value measured, The highest group includes ileum, jejunum, and omasum; the medium group includes rumen and duodenum; and the lowest group includes reticulum, abomasum, cecum, and colon.
出处 《动物营养学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期183-190,共8页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANIMAL NUTRITION
基金 山东省奶牛良种工程项目资助
关键词 Ⅰ型肽载体(PepT Ⅰ) RT-PCR 表达量 Bovine Peptide transporter Ⅰ (PepT Ⅰ ) RT-PCR Expression level
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Livak K J, Flood S J, Marmaro J, Giusti W, Deetz K. Oligonucleotides with fluorescent dyes at opposite ends provide a quenched probe system useful for detecting PCR product and nucleic acid hybridizatio PCR. Methods (Appl.), 1995, 4: 357-362.
  • 2Newey H, Smyth D. Intracellular hydrolysis of dipeptides during intestinal absorption. Journal of Physiology, 1960, 152: 367-272.
  • 3Ganapathy V, Leibach F H. Role of pH Gradient and membrane potential transport in intestinal and renal brush-border membrane vesicles from the rabbit. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1983, 258 (23) : 14189-14192.
  • 4Gardner M L G. Absorption of amino acids and peptides from a complex mixture in the isolated small intestine of the rat. Journal of Physiology, 1975, 253: 233-241.
  • 5Galibois I, Pitre F, Parent G, Savoie L. Analysis of bound amino acids in the plasma of fed rats: A new preparation procedure. Journal o f Nutrition Biochemistry, 1991, 2: 25-30.
  • 6Noren O, Shostrom H, Josefsson L. Studies on soluble dipeptides from pig intestinal mucosa . Ⅰ. Purification and specificity. Biochimica et Biophysicl Acta, 1973, 327: 446-452.
  • 7Adibi S A, Philips E. Evidence for greater absorption of amino acids from peptide than from free form in human intestine. Clinical Research, 1968, 16 :446-452.
  • 8Asatoor A M, Cheng B, Edwards K D G, Lant A F, Matthews D M, Miline M D, Navab F, Richard A J. Intestinal absorption of dipeptides in Hartnup disease. Gut, 1970, 11: 380-387.
  • 9Said H M, Ghishan F K, Redha R. Transport of glycyl-L-Proline in intestinal brush-border membrane vesicles of the sucking rat:characteristics and maturation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta , 1988, 941: 232-241.
  • 10Himukai M, Kameyama A, Hoshi T. Interaction of glycylcine and Na^+ at mucosal border of guinea-pig small intestine: A non-mutual stimulation of transport. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1983, 732:659- 665.

同被引文献26

  • 1蒋培红,初汉平,许腾.小肽对断奶獭兔生长性能和免疫性能的影响[J].中国饲料,2007(8):29-31. 被引量:8
  • 2MATTHEWS J C, WEBB K E. Absorption of L- carnosine, L-methionine, and L-methionylglycine by isolated sheep ruminal and omasal epithelial tissue [J]. J AnimSci, 1995,73: 3463-3475.
  • 3REMOND D, BEMARD L, PONCET C. Free and peptide amino acid net flux across the rumen and the mesenteric- and portal-drained viscera of sheep[J]. J Anita Sci, 2000, 78:1960-1972.
  • 4DIRIENZO D B. Free and peptide amino acid fluxes across the mesenteric and nonmesenteric viscera of sheep and calves[C]. PhD Dissertation, Virginia Pol- ytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 1990.
  • 5KOELN L L, SCHLAGHECK T G, WEBB K E. A- mino acid flux across the gastrointestinal tract and liver of calves[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1993,76:2275-2285.
  • 6SEAL C J, PARKER D S. Effect of intraruminal propionic acid infusion on metabolism of mesenteric- and portal-drained viscera in growing steers fed a for- age diet : I I Ammonia, Urea, amino acid, amd pep- tides[J]. J Anim Sci, 1996,74:245-256.
  • 7WIKSTROM P, HAGLUND L, FORSMAN M. Structure of a natural microbial community in a ni- troaromatic comtaminated groundwater is altered dur- ing biodegradation of extrinsic, but not intrinsic sub-stratesrJ]. Microbial Ecol, 2000, 39: 203-210.
  • 8MAYER Z,FARBER P,GEISEN R. Monitoring the production of aflatoxin B1 in wheat by measuring the concentration of nor-1 mRNA[J]. Appl Env Micro- biol, 2003,69(2) :1154-1158.
  • 9WONG M L, MEDRANO J F. Real-time PCR for mRNA quantitation[M]. Biotechniques, 2005, 39: 75-85.
  • 10KENNETH J L, SCHMITTGEN T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantita- tive PCR and the 2-AAct method[J]. Methods, 2001, 25:402-408.

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部