期刊文献+

假设与求证:戴震考证方法论刍议 被引量:1

Hypothesis and Testifying:Dai Zhen's Ways of Textual Criticism
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 胡适化用戴震"但宜推求,勿为株守"为"大胆的假设,小心的求证",并以之作为清代学者治学方法的典型示例教育后学。然而,戴震重视运用假设与求证方法的具体实践,今人很少论及。从材料出发,对戴氏反对凿空和株守,倡导归纳和推求的考证方法加以推阐,可为我们今天国学研究的提供借鉴。 By decoding Dai Zhen's"reasoning instead of sticking " into "bold to hypothesize and careful to testify", Hu Shi set it a good example of Qing scholars for the later generations to follow. However, the specific practice of Dai' s focus in implementing hypothesis and testifying is neglected today. The paper, starting from original materials, tries to propose that Dai's objection of empty talk and useless sticking, his advocating of textual criticism in induction and reasoning should be used for today's studies of Chinese national culture.
作者 徐道彬
出处 《皖西学院学报》 2008年第1期140-143,共4页 Journal of West Anhui University
关键词 戴震 治学方法 归纳和推求 Dai Zhen ways of studies induction and reasoning
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1梁启超.清代学术概论[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1998..
  • 2戴震.戴震全书(1--7)[M].合肥:黄山书社,1994-97.
  • 3胡适.胡适全集[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,2003.
  • 4段玉裁.说文解字注[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1998.
  • 5钱大昕.十驾斋养新录[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,2000..
  • 6马瑞辰.毛诗传笺通释[M].北京:中华书局,1998
  • 7阮元.十三经注疏校勘记[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
  • 8阮元.皇清经解[M].上海:上海书店,1988.
  • 9钱玄.三礼词典[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,1998.
  • 10王引之.经传释词[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1985..

共引文献392

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部