期刊文献+

画钟测验对轻度血管性认知障碍和血管性痴呆的诊断作用 被引量:17

The value of the clock drawing test for identifying mild vascular cognitive impairment and mild vascular dementia
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨画钟测验(clock drawing test,CDT)对识别轻度血管性认知障碍(mild vascular cognitive impairment,mVCI)和轻度血管性痴呆(mild vascular dementia,mVD)患者的敏感度和特异度。方法mVCI患者80例,mVD患者30例,正常对照80名。由独立的神经心理评估医师盲法检测CDT,采用3分法、阿尔茨海默病协作研究组方法(AD cooperative study)和Rouleau方法进行评分,并进行简易精神状态(mini-mental state examination,MMSE)及其他量表的检测。应用操作者特征性曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)确定3种评分方法的CDT对区别mVCI和正常对照以及mVD与正常对照的敏感度和特异度。结果3组间在年龄、性别和教育程度上匹配。在区别mVCI和正常对照中,3种评分方法CDT的敏感度分别为63·7%、65·0%、68·7%,特异度分别为87·5%、86·2%、78·7%。3种评分方法的CDT对区别mVD和正常对照均有较高的敏感度(90·0%、90·0%、83·3%)和特异度(87·5%、86·2%、95·0%)。结论对识别mVD,CDT是一种有效的筛查手段;但是对识别mVCI,CDT的作用有限。 Objective To determine the validity of the clock drawing test (CDT) in differentiating mild vascular cognitive impairment (mVCI) patients and mild vascular dementia (mVD) patients from normal subjects. Methods Eighty mVCI patients, 30 mVD patients, and 80 normal control subjects were comprehensively evaluated with mini-mental state examination ( MMSE), CDT and other tests. CDT was blindly scored by independent clinical psychclogists according to three methods: the three point method, the AD Cooperative Study method, and the Rouleau method. The sensitivities and specificities of the three CDT measures for identifying the two patient groups from normal controls were determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Results The three groups matched in demographic characteristics. In differentiating between mVCI and normal subjects, the three CDT measures provided a sensitivity of 63.7%, 65.0%, and 68. 7%, and a specificity of 87.5%, 86. 2%, and 78.7% respectively. All the three CDT measures showed good validity in identifying mVD from normal controls ( sensitivity 90.0%, 90. 0%, 83.3% ; specificity 87.5%, 86. 2%, 95.0% ). Conclusions Though CDT is valid in screening for mVD, it is not a reliable instrument in screening mVCI.
出处 《中国神经精神疾病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第2期72-75,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases
关键词 画钟测验 轻度血管性认知障碍 轻度血管性痴呆 敏感度 特异度 Clock drawing test Mild vascular cognitive impairment Mild vascular dementia Sensitivity Specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Zhang ZX, Zahner GE, Roman GC, et al. Dementia subtypes in China: prevalence in Beijing, Xian, Shanghai, and Chengdu[ J]. Arch Neurel, 2005, 62 (3) : 447 -453.
  • 2Zanetti M, Ballabio C, Abbate C, et al. Mild cognitive impairment subtypes and vascular dementia in community-dwelling elderly people: a 3-year follow-up study[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2006, 54 (4) : 580 -586.
  • 3Shulman KI. Clock-drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test?. [J]. lnt J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2000, 15 (6) : 548 -561.
  • 4Garrett KD, Browndyke JN, Whelihan W, et al. The neuropsychological profile of vascular cognitive impairment-no dementia: comparisons to patients at risk for cerebrovascular disease and vascular dementia[J]. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 2004, 19 (6) : 745 - 757.
  • 5Ingles JL, Wentzel C, Fisk JD, et al. Neuropsychological predictors of incident dementia in patients with vascular cognitive impairment, without dementia [ J ]. Stroke, 2002, 33 (8) : 1999 - 2002.
  • 6Powlishta KK, Von Dras DD, Stanford A, et al. The clock drawing test is a poor screen for very mild dementia[J]. Neurology, 2002, 59 (6) : 898 - 903.
  • 7Rouleau I, Salmon DP, Butters N. Longitudinal analysis of clock drawing in alzheimer's disease patients [ J ]. Brain Cogn, 1996, 31 (1): 17 -34.
  • 8Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Valenzuela M J, et al. The neuropsychological profile of vascular cognitive impairment in stroke and TIA patients[J]. Neurology, 2004, 62 (6) : 912 -919.
  • 9Prins ND, van Dijk El, den Heijer T, et al. Cerebral small-vessel disease and decline in information processing speed, executive function and memory[J].. Brain, 2005, 128 (9) : 2034 -2041.
  • 10Loewenstein DA, Acevedo A, Agron J, et al. Cognitive profiles in Alzheimer's disease and in mild cognitive impairment of different etiologies[J]. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 2006, 21 (5 -6) : 309 -315.

同被引文献295

引证文献17

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部