期刊文献+

兰索拉唑与莫沙必利联合治疗反流性食管炎的临床观察 被引量:2

Treatment of reflux esophageal disease by lansoprazole combined with mosapride
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察兰索拉唑与莫沙必利联合治疗反流性食管炎的临床效果。方法89例反流性食管炎患者随机分为两组,治疗组50例用兰索拉唑和莫沙必利,对照组39例用盐酸雷尼替丁胶囊,观察治疗前及治疗后4、8周的临床症状改善情况和内镜变化。结果用药4周时,治疗组反酸、恶心及胸骨后疼痛治疗有效率分别为78%、84%、82%,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。用药8周结束时,治疗组反酸、悲心及胸骨后疼痛全部改善,总有效率分别是98%、98%和93%,明显优于对照组的64%、81%和73%(均P〈0.05);内镜4周、8周复查治疗组与对照组食管黏膜病损愈合率分别为84%和62%,96%和77%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论兰索拉唑、莫沙必利联合用药是治疗反流性食管炎安全、有效的方法。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of combined therapy of lansoprazole and mosapride for treatment of reflux esophageal disease. Methods Eighty-nine patients with reflux esophageal disease were enrolled and divided into two groups randomly. Fifty patients in treatment group were administrated with lansoprazole and mosapride; 39 patients in control group were administrared with ranitidine. Symptoms and endoscope changes were observed before treatment and 4 weeks, 8 weeks after treatment. Results The symptoms(acid regurgitation, hear-burn,retrosternl pain) were relieved significantly 4 weeks after treatment compared with control group. All symptoms were improved better than the results at 4th week. The total response rates for the three symptoms above were 98 % ,98 % and 93 % respectively obviously better than 64 %, 81%, 73 % of control group (both P 〈 0.05 ). Esophageal healing rates detected by endoscope were 84 % and 62 % after 4 weeks in treatment and control group respectively,and 96 % and 77 % after 8 weeks treatment( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The combined therapy of lansoprazole and mosapride is safe and efficient for the treatment of reflux esophageal disease.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2008年第1期30-31,共2页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 兰索拉唑 莫沙必利 食管炎 消化性 Lansoprazole Mosapride Esophagitis, peptic
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献28

  • 1李宗文,杨进华,何国永.功能性间置双腔空肠袋代胃在全胃切除中的应用[J].中国基层医药,2005,12(5):576-577. 被引量:2
  • 2[20]Wilson KT,Fu S,Ramanujamk S,et al.Increased expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 in Barrett's esophagus and associated adenocarcinomas.Cancer Res,1998,58(14):2829-34
  • 3[21]Cadiot G,Bruhat A,Riguad D,et al.Multivariate analysis of pathophysiological factors in reflux esophagitis.Gut,1997,40(2):167-74
  • 4[1]Penagini R,Schoeman MN,Dent J,et al.Motor events underlying gastro-esophageal reflux in ambulant patients with reflux esophagitis.Neurogastroentorol Motil,1996;8(2):131-41
  • 5[2]Grossi L,Ciccaglione AF,Travaglini N,et al.Swallows,esophageal and gastric motility in normal subjects and in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease:a 24h PH-manometric study.Neuro-gastroenterol Motil,1998;10(2):115-21
  • 6[3]Johnson LF,Harmon JW.Experimental esophagitis in a rabbit model.J Clin Gastroenterol 1986;8(Suppl 1):26-44
  • 7[4]Bremner RM,Crookes PF,DeMeester TR,et al.Concentration and refluxed acid and esophageal mucosal injury.Am J Surg,1992;164(5):522-7
  • 8[5]Blackshaw LA,Dent J.Lower esophageal sphincter response to noxious esophageal chemical stimuli in the ferret:involvement of tachykinin receptors.J Auton Nerv Syst,1997;13:66(3):189-200
  • 9[6]Eriksen CA,Cullen PT,Sutton D,et al.Abnormal esophageal transit in patients with typical reflux symptoms but normal endoscopic and PH profiles.Am J Surg,1991,161(6):657-61
  • 10[7]Chiba N,DeGara CJ,Wilkinson JM,et al.Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade Ⅱ to Ⅳ gastroesophageal reflux disease:a metaanalysis.Gastroenterology,1997,112(6):1798-810

共引文献253

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部